Search for: "United States v. Xu"
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2011, 7:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 3:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 11:35 am
They get caught and flee to the United States using fake immigration documents, and are prosecuted in federal court. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Today’s case of the day, Gucci America, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 10:45 am
Last week, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals clarified the rule for treating several works as a "single unit of publication" for registration purposes in Unicolors, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
Because it was in financial difficulty, it sought new investment from the United States. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
" As he feared, Xu was fired from his job and was unable to find other employment in the United States or China. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 4:05 pm
Hong Kong XU YING v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:44 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:57 am
(A “United States work” is a work first published in the United States, or simultaneously published in the United States and any foreign country; or an unpublished work (or a work first published in a nation with whom the United States does not have a copyright treaty) for which all authors are citizens of or domiciled in the United States. 17 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
From Gladstone to Thatcher: The Shortage of Parliamentary Time in the United Kingdom and the Implications for Tax Legislation – and BeyondJohn H N Pearce (Formerly HMRC; Associate of the Institute of Taxation, UK)5. 'The normal meaning of securities is not open to doubt'; Viscount Cave in Singer v Williams (1920). [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:42 am
World Capital Market Inc.; WCM777 Inc.; WCM777 Ltd. d/b/a WCM777 Enterprises, Inc.; and Ming Xu a/k/a Phil Ming XuCase Number: 14-cv-02334 (United States District Court for the Central District of California)Case Filed: March 27, 2014Qualifying Judgment/Order: February 20, 2015 3/31/15 6/29/15 2015-29 SEC v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:04 am
‘Un Somaro Piumato’--Rethinking the Scope and Nature of State Liability for Acts of their Commercial Instrumentalities: State Owned Enterprises and State-Owner Liability in the Post-Global Larry Catá Backer[1] Abstract: Under what circumstances might a state be subject to liability for the conduct of its state owned enterprises (SOEs)? [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 11:28 am
Regulatory hegemony becomes important in that context, and hegemony for the purpose of preserving the solidity and position of States within complex clusters of human collectives may be served virtually through regulation platforms that serve as a united front. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 4:47 am
Read the complete Department of Justice announcement at Chinese Military Personnel Charged with Computer Fraud, Economic Espionage and Wire Fraud Criminal Indictment (United States of America v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
The excellent questions raised show how fertile a field this is for scholars to till.A few years ago, David Congdon, now the Senior Editor at Kansas, told us it was a high priority of his to issue a book on United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2025, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court 30 years ago in Babbitt v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
United States, 484 U.S. 19 (1987). [14] United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm
United States California has implemented new blockchain legislation, a move which has drawn commentary from the Hunton Andrews Kurth Blog. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 12:09 pm
Many find their way into the hands of art dealers and collectors in the Europe or even United States. [read post]
