Search for: "United States v. a Fee Simple Parcel of Real Property"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2014, 9:34 am
The Court explained: When the United States patented the Fox Park parcel to Brandt’s parents in 1976, it conveyed fee simple title to that land, “subject to those rights for railroad purposes” that had been granted to the LHP&P. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 9:07 am
United States, involving another do-gooder, this time in Burlington, Vermont, trying to convert an old railbed to a recreational trail. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 2:42 pm
For example, if a user prints a record from the client, the client generates and sends a SOAP call of the print request to the middle tier where it is logged for billing purposes.LPS is a real estate data analytics company that used Laredo to gather real property data. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 10:32 am
The grant was not finalized by the time war broke out between Mexico and the United States in 1848. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 7:07 pm
They each acquired present possessory, fee simple absolute estates with respect to both properties. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
Kelo v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 9:01 pm
The residential parcel is known as “Lot 9” in the 9-unit residential subdivision known as Hidden Hills. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 10:56 am
The court does not disagree with the plaintiff's assertion that as a fee simple owner of the property, "[p]laintiff had the right to sell and develop the Property. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 9:39 pm
United States, supra, at 175, 100 S.Ct., at 390. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
Cir. 2012) (quoting United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Petitioner challenged the County’s use of the commonsense exemption (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)), and the existing facilities exemption (CEQA Guidelines §15301) to support its condemnation proceedings to acquire fee simple title to three sites that the County currently leases and uses for landfills and the County’s continued operation of the landfills. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Petitioner challenged the County’s use of the commonsense exemption (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)), and the existing facilities exemption (CEQA Guidelines §15301) to support its condemnation proceedings to acquire fee simple title to three sites that the County currently leases and uses for landfills and the County’s continued operation of the landfills. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Petitioner challenged the County’s use of the commonsense exemption (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)), and the existing facilities exemption (CEQA Guidelines §15301) to support its condemnation proceedings to acquire fee simple title to three sites that the County currently leases and uses for landfills and the County’s continued operation of the landfills. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
In 1974, the County adopted a rezoning measure that reduced how many residences Martha could build on its property. [read post]
