Search for: "United States vs. Flores"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2017, 11:02 am
On July 5, 2017, a three judge-panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals handed down a unanimous ruling stating immigration officials must continue to follow a 1997 lawsuit decision, Flores vs. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
On October 20, 2008, the Supreme Court granted to hear the case of Flores-Figueroa vs. the United States to decide a point of law that might yield profound ramifications for Federal identity theft law. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 2:08 pm
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., ATL-L-3394-11 (MT) and Amelia Flores vs. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Flores, but re-enacted in 2000. [read post]
15 May 2012, 11:25 am
Oral argument argued before the Eighth Circuit U.S. [read post]
11 May 2016, 10:52 am
United States, 533 U.S. 27, 121 S. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:04 am
Flores, 322 Fed. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 9:01 pm
Flores, , the most extreme religious liberty law in the history of the United States—the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993—was held unconstitutional every way to Sunday. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:13 am
Flores. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 5:13 am
United States, 961 F.2d 17, 20-22 (1st Cir. 1992); United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm
United States and then again in the 1990 decision, Employment Div. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 10:04 am
Flores v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Flores, but when the Democrats blinked and let the RFRA of 2000 pass–and the Rutherford Institute fanned out to the 50 states to enact state RFRAs–the religious liberty weapons they needed to fight for their beliefs about abortion were available.I suppose, in their defense, they were relying on Roe v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Flores. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 8:41 am
(Emphasis added.)A former federal agent in the northeastern United States who received such tips from SOD described the process. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:27 pm
Unit A Feb. 1981)). [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm
They argued that their clients shouldn’t have to pay taxes (United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:00 pm
Instead, we are talking about a religious test.By the way, that is unconstitutional:“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the… [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:26 am
Flores example on which paper is based is outstanding because there were no “foreign” cultural thieves at issue. [read post]
