Search for: "United States vs. Smith" Results 121 - 140 of 312
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2015, 1:34 pm by Edward Smith
The CDC statistics are related to incidents in the United States. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 12:03 pm by Edward Smith
Some of the statistics that have been published by the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration include: In 2016, the number of fatalities on the roads in the United States rose by close to 2,000. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Now you may ask: how can a state overturn a United States Supreme Court decision on religious liberty? [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 2:15 am by Florian Mueller
And while I'm not a games industry employee per se, I was the first person to work for Blizzard entertainment as a consultant and representative outside the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:29 am by Jennifer Davis
We have these related materials in the collections: KF224.R33 U5 United States of America, libelant vs. one book called “Ulysses”, Random House, Inc., claimant / United States District Court, Southern District of New York. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Smith, if the law is neutral and generally applicable, it is subjected to rationality review. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 6:02 pm by Charley Moore and Eva Arevuo
“While we regret having to prevent the world from having access to Wikipedia for even a second, we simply cannot ignore the fact that SOPA and PIPA endanger free speech both in the United States and abroad, and set a frightening precedent of Internet censorship for the world. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Smith ’67 Professor of Law and Faculty Co-Director of the Center for Firearms Law at Duke University Law School. [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 10:19 am by David Kopel
 Baldwin, 165 U.S. 275 (1897), the United States Supreme Court made clear that it, too, understood the Second Amendment as not protecting the right to carry a concealed weapon. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Zim Direct Marketing LTD (IP Factor) Supreme Court affirms Tel Aviv District Court ruling that where Customs was dealing with the issue, they would not get involved: Imperiat TsaAttsuim vs. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Zim Direct Marketing LTD (IP Factor) Supreme Court affirms Tel Aviv District Court ruling that where Customs was dealing with the issue, they would not get involved: Imperiat TsaAttsuim vs. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
  I would add to the Smith reasoning that the religious believers have an obligation to prove to legislators that the accommodation they seek is not dangerous and is consistent with the public good, as I set forth at length in my book God vs. the Gavel: Religion and the Rule of Law. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Rogers College of Law, Promotion of Drugs and Devices: Off-Label and No-LabelJason Smith, California State University, East Bay, Health, the First Amendment and the Ethics of the Patient-Physician Interaction Health Care Financing and Regulation Session 1B – Room 245Developments in Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity: Enforcement, Guidance and ImplementationModerator: Paul Lombardo, Georgia State University College of LawMelissa Alexander, University of Wyoming… [read post]