Search for: "Universal Motown"
Results 21 - 36
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2009, 7:13 am
If you want to offer your feedback on the column, use the contact form or just follow me on Twitter at @plagiarismtoday. 1: Shahanda Moursy sues the RIAA First off today, Sandray Moursy, a defendant in one of the many RIAA file sharing cases, has filed a counter-suit North Carolina against Vivendi Universal, Warner Music, Sony BMG, Motown Records and the RIAA itself as well as two of their investigation agencies, Safenet and MediaSentry. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 6:00 am
They further claim that the administrator lacks the authority to file a lawsuit as other parties are involved and need to be consulted. 3: Why Unreleased Marvin Gaye, Supremes, Beach Boys Tracks Are Suddenly Appearing: EU Copyright Law Finally today, Robert Levine at Billboard reports that, on December 30th, Universal Music Group released a digital-only album entitled Motown Unreleased: 1966. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 2:08 am
Records, and their affiliated companies, such as Interscope, Arista, UMG, Fonovisa, Motown, Atlantic, Priority, and others.2. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:30 am
Charles O'Rourke, Opposition No. 91178937 [Section 2(d) opposition to registration of the mark MTOWN CLOTHING & Design for various clothing items, based upon Opposer's mark MOTOWN registered for entertainment services and used for a variety of goods and services, including clothing].Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 7:15 am
Faculty experts from across Washington University in St. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Alabama)Motown v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 11:03 am
Under the district court’s holding, one could start a competing record label today called Motown, Sony, Universal or Def Jam, and so long as they could provide any artistic reason for the name, they would be protected under the First Amendment, regardless of the amount of consumer confusion. [read post]
3 May 2017, 11:03 am
Under the district court’s holding, one could start a competing record label today called Motown, Sony, Universal or Def Jam, and so long as they could provide any artistic reason for the name, they would be protected under the First Amendment, regardless of the amount of consumer confusion. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:15 am
From Motown Record Co., LP v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
Does 1-25 before Judge Swain, Motown v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 12:00 pm
Sometimes it’s mostly Motown. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:53 am
Fido's Fences, Inc (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC reverses TTAB’s Bose fraud ruling, eviscerates Medinol: In re Bose Corporation (TTABlog) (TTABlog) (Intellectual Property Law Blog) (IPKat) (Patently-O) (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) 9th Circuit finds in favour of Paris Hilton in her suit against Hallmark Cards for violating her right of publicity and using her THAT’S HOT registered trademark without permission: Hilton v Hallmark… [read post]
5 May 2010, 8:22 am
LEXIS 12159 (N.D.N.Y Feb. 18, 2009). http://tinyurl.com/2dxvoxq Motown Record Co., L.P. v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 8:25 am
Knight's stellar career started with Motown records in the late sixties. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Gasaway, University of Georgia School of Law; Professor Michael Madison, University of Pittsburgh School of Law; Professor Ruth Okediji, University of Oklahoma Law School; Alfred C. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:58 am
We put Motown online when Netscape was king. [read post]
