Search for: "Unknown Persons and Interested Parties" Results 61 - 80 of 1,777
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2018, 11:56 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
General Principle It is a fundamental legal concept that a term in an agreement which is ambiguous, that is capable of at least two interpretations, should be read against the interest of the party which drafted the document. [read post]
23 May 2017, 10:45 am by Russell Spivak
In an interesting examination of the role of social media platforms and terrorism, the U.S. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Not only should you understand what your coverage limits are, you need to make sure that you have adequate limits in place to protect against the unknown. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 5:07 pm by APransky
Usually every person has good conduct and bad conduct during a relationship. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Cantor, considered by many to be a future Speaker of the House, was trounced by a previously unknown college economics professor, David Brat, who ran a shoestring campaign espousing a Tea Party world-view. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 7:28 am by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
The land court examiner filed a title report identifying three persons as parties entitled to notice and requested current addresses from the town. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 7:28 am by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
The land court examiner filed a title report identifying three persons as parties entitled to notice and requested current addresses from the town. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:30 am
No such unknowns exist with respect to digital data. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 11:35 pm by Al Saikali
A data breach can result in the exposure of private customer information (credit card information, social security numbers, email addresses, etc.) to unknown third parties who may fraudulently use that information. [read post]
18 May 2018, 10:37 am
I wrote "ditsy" this morning (to describe an article titled "I’m Ready for the Female Takeover of the Democratic Party/The Venusification of the Democratic Party is on, and this man says it’s high time"), and Known Unknown wrote: "I prefer 'ditzy.' The z works better at communicating the thought. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 8:14 am by Mack Sperling
Judge Bledsoe dismissed that argument as "fully absurd," stating that this contention: leads to the implausible and fully absurd construction that the parties intended that any non-party to the Release Agreement could purchase a release of its liability to TaiDoc -- on any claim whatsoever -- by purchasing a membership interest. . . in Prodigy, without TaiDoc having bargained for or contemplated that party's release from liability. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 11:36 am by Darren Stevenson
These documents tend to be lengthy and written in legalese, alienating readers while obfuscating third-party data sharing agreements. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 1:00 am
Nevertheless, this Kat disagrees with the principles behind the judge’s analysis and wonders what readers make of it.The case is not without other interest, and the IPKat may return to it in future posts: in particular the judgment contains an intriguing postscript detailing why a critical section had to be rewritten after it was circulated in draft form to the parties and was criticised by the patentee. [read post]
24 May 2017, 3:06 pm by Jules M. Haas
All of these types of cases require that interested parties be notified so that they can protect their interests. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:06 am by Matthew Nied
[Warman, at para. 33] After surveying previous decisions, Justice Wilton-Siegel set out four considerations, aimed at preventing abuse of the Rules and respecting the privacy of internet users, that should have been considered by the motions judge in deciding whether to order disclosure under the Rules: whether the unknown alleged wrongdoer could have a reasonable expectation of anonymity in the particular circumstances; whether the Respondent has established a prima facie case against the… [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am by INFORRM
In the recent case of Terry (previously ‘LNS’) v Persons Unknown ([2010] EWHC 119 (QB)) the court addressed the inter-relationship between two principles: the principle that the court may grant an interim injunction to restrain a threatened misuse of private information where the claimant can show that his claim is (at least) more likely than not to succeed, and the rule in Bonnard v Perryman ([1891] 2 Ch 269 (CA)) whereby the court almost invariably will not grant an… [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 2:06 am by Jani
McFadden was brazenly aware of the infringing acts being committed on his network is unknown to this writer, and he awaits the decision of the ECJ with some interest. [read post]