Search for: "Utility Air Regulatory Group, Petitioner v. Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 11:26 am
(In addition to EPA, respondents opposing Massachusetts and the petitioners were the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, National Automobile Dealers Association, Engine Manufacturers Association, Truck Manufacturers Association, CO2 Litigation Group, Utility Air Regulatory Group, and ten states (MI, AK, ID, KN, NB, ND, OH, SD, TX and UT). [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
In 2005, ASARCO filed for bankruptcy protection when faced with mounting environmental claims, falling copper process, and a striking work force. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:10 pm
Backstrom, James V. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 7:59 am
The issue on which the Supreme Court granted cert. in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
That alternative is backed by a diverse group that includes The Bay Institute, the Contra Costa Council, Defenders of Wildlife, Environmental Entrepreneurs, the Planning and Conservation League, the Natural Resources Defense Council, the San Diego County Water Authority, Alameda County Water District, Contra Costa Water District, East Bay Municipal Utility District, Otay Water District, the City of San Diego and the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission.… [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
Environmental Protection Agency and the Justice Department announced today. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
This case presents the following issue: When a lead agency performs a subsequent environmental review and prepares a subsequent environmental impact report, a subsequent negative declaration, or an addendum, is the agency’s decision reviewed under a substantial evidence standard of review (Mani Brothers Real Estate Group v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:01 am
Environmental Protection Agency 12-1253Issue: Whether the Clean Air Act and this Court’s decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm
Environmental Protection Agency, 12-1253; Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
County of Mono v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE 1. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 4:30 am
Next week a rogues’ gallery of science-denying industry associations, right-wing advocacy groups, Tea Party backers, and ultra-conservative elected officials get their day in court – two days, actually – to challenge the Environmental Protection Agency’s “endangerment finding” and its other actions under the Clean Air Act to start curbing the carbon pollution that drives dangerous climate change. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
The Fifth Appellate District rejected the holding in Native American Sacred Site & Environmental Protection Association v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
This case presents the following issue: When a lead agency performs a subsequent environmental review and prepares a subsequent environmental impact report, a subsequent negative declaration, or an addendum, is the agency’s decision reviewed under a substantial evidence standard of review (Mani Brothers Real Estate Group v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 11:08 am
The parties on NAM’s side of the case include agricultural companies and trade associations, electric utilities, states and environmental groups – all frequent challengers of EPA decisions. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 1:15 pm
Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
