Search for: "Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA" Results 41 - 60 of 207
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 10:48 am by Miriam Seifter
  The Court’s choice not even to discuss deference may thus reflect what some commentators have perceived as an anti-deference mood in recent Roberts Court opinions (such as Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
EPA, which said that the, before regulating mercury under the Clean Air Act, the agency must complete a cost-benefit analysis and find that the regulation “is necessary and appropriate. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:56 am by Marty Lederman
” (p.16, quoting Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 5:42 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
[Blogger’s Note:  This post is submitted as a necessarily-lengthy formal comment to the November 20, 2015  draft guidance of U.S. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 6:21 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The EPA can imposed fines of up to $37,000 for every vehicle for Clear Air Act violation, which would equate to a total penalty of about $18 billion. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
EPA, that EPA, when deciding whether it was appropriate and necessary to regulate Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) such as, for instance, mercury and other toxic pollutants emitted from electric utility power plants, must consider the costs of compliance at this stage of the rulemaking proceedings. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:27 pm by Adam White
As mentioned earlier, we saw this doctrine arise last year in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:35 pm by Elizabeth Price Foley and David Rivkin
  The King majority appears to have invoked some odd form of the “clear statement rule” to bolster its conclusion, citing the Court’s 2014 decision in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 9:30 pm by Hilary K. Nakasone
The Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in Michigan v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 3:00 am
EPA, 684 F. 3d 102, reversed in part by the Supreme Court in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 8:54 am by WIMS
Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 8:55 am by WIMS
EPA; Linked with: Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]