Search for: "V v. S."
Results 1 - 20
of 398,419
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2012, 2:01 am
Regina v H (J); Same v Ferris; Same v W (A); Same v Walker; Same v Dan; Same v S (C); Same v Robertson; Same v P (M) [2011] EWCA Crim 2753; [2012] WLR (D) 12 “In principle, in historic or cold cases, a defendant had to be sentenced in accordance with the sentencing regime applicable at the date of sentence. [read post]
20 May 2011, 2:15 am
Regina v D (N); Regina v P (A); Regina v U (S) [2011] WLR (D) 166 “Evidence that a defendant had viewed child pornography was capable of being adduced in evidence at trial under section 101(1)(d) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 to demonstrate a propensity for offences involving the sexual abuse of children. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 3:34 pm
State and State v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:15 am
The post ASHTON S. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:31 am
R v T; R v B; R v C; R v H [2009] EWCA Crim 1035; [2009] WLR (D) 19 “A criminal trial without a jury did not contravene a defendant's right to a fair trial where there was a real danger of jury tampering and proposed measures to prevent such interference did not sufficiently address [...] [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 2:59 am
R v Foster; R v Newman; R v Kempster; R v Birmingham [2007] EWCA Crim 2869 “Where the defendant admitted a lesser or different crime from that charged in the indictment it did not necessarily follow that the trial judge was obliged to leave the alternative verdict for a jury's consideration; sometimes it would be appropriate, but sometimes it would not. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:50 am
M; Regina v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:49 pm
Here’s the abstract: Can eighteenth-century constitutional commitments that “courts shall... [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:13 pm
Dukes, and Turner v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:01 am
Regina (S) v Secretary of State for Justice; Regina (KF) v Same [2012] EWHC 1810 (Admin); [2012] WLR (D) 191 “Guidance in prison service instructions as to the approach to be followed by prison governors when exercising their discretion to make deductions from prisoners’ earnings to raise funds to support victims of crime was not unlawful. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 9:23 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF; Same v AM; Same v AN; Same v AE [2008] EWCA Civ 1148; [2008] WLR (D) 320 “The Court of Appeal gave guidance on the proper approach to the compatibility with the right to a fair trial in art 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of hearings under s 3(10) of the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 to determine whether the Secretary of State for the Home… [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 11:21 am
As mentioned by Current Awareness, The Times reports today that the Court of Appeal has upheld the decision in S v S [2008] EWHC 519 (Fam), under the headline: "Ex-wife wins new home and £50,000 a year maintenance - for her horses". [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 2:32 am
Regina v Twomey (John); Regina v Blake (Peter); Regina v Cameron (Glen); Regina v Hibberd (Barry) Court of Appeal “A defendant's right to a fair trial was not prejudiced by holding a criminal trial without a jury, where the danger of jury tampering was very significant and was not sufficiently addressed by proposed protective measures. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:14 am
Pankina v Secretary of State for the Home Dept; Malekia v Secretary of State for the Home Dept; Ahmed v Secretary of State for the Home Dept; Junaideen v Secretary of State for the Home Dept; Ali v Secretary of State for the Home Dept; Sankar v Secretary of State for the Home Dept [2010] EWCA Civ 719; [2010] WLR (D) 158 ”The immigration rules could not lawfully incorporate provisions set out in another document which had not… [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 1:50 pm
It’s titled: “United States v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 2:54 pm
California is whether evidence obtained in a search of petitioner's cell phone and admitted at petitioner's trial violated the petitioner's Fourth Amendment rights. [read post]
8 May 2014, 2:54 pm
California is whether evidence obtained in a search of petitioner's cell phone and admitted at petitioner's trial violated the petitioner's Fourth Amendment rights. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 5:17 pm
Post v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:46 am
Regina v S (G) [2012] WLR (D) 28 “The transmission of electronically stored data to only one recipient is sufficient publication with section 1(3) of the Obscene Publications Act 1959 for the purposes of a prosecution under that Act.” WLR Daily, 9th February 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 5:54 am
COUSINS v. [read post]
