Search for: "V. B."
Results 21 - 40
of 62,025
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2010, 2:38 am
Regina v B (F); Same v P (A); Same v C (J) [2010] EWCA Crim 1857; [2010] WLR (D) 21 “A judge sitting in the Crown Court had no power to quash an indictment simply because he did not believe that the proceedings were appropriately brought or were not in the public interest when compared with his assessment of the needs of other cases and that had not changed as a result of the introduction of the Criminal Procedure Rules 2010. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 2:46 am
McGowan v B [2011] UKSC 54; [2011] WLR (D) 339 “There was no rule of the European Court of Human Rights that a suspect in police custody could only waive his right of access to legal advice before and during police questioning if he had first received legal advice as to whether he should do so.” WLR Daily, 23rd November 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 10:08 am
DISMISSED – Criminal Damage, State v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 9:24 am
DUI REDUCED to Reckless Driving – State v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 11:40 am
ROBERTS v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:18 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 12-0080, 2012 MT 246, B BAR J RANCH, LLC, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 5:19 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 6:19 am
ALICE B. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 7:40 am
In 2015, based upon the Court of Appeals’s decision in Unger v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 9:25 am
B. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 8:24 am
R v B and others: [2008] WLR (D) 296 “Where one of several defendants in the same criminal proceedings became unfit to stand trial before a jury had been empanelled there was nothing in principle to prevent a single empanelled jury subsequently proceeding to hear the trial of all the defendants, although in the case of the unfit defendant the jury would now be looking to the question whether he had committed the actus reus of the relevant offence. [read post]
22 May 2008, 3:18 am
Regina v B Court of Appeal “The Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, would not give the Crown leave to appeal unless it was seriously arguable, not that a judge in exercising his discretion or making his judgment in the course of a criminal trial might have decided differently, but that it was unreasonable for him to have done it in the way he had. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 11:19 am
By Jason Rantanen Mettler-Toledo, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 7:27 am
Why Pereira v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 1:58 am
Enfield Technical Services Ltd v Payne Grace v B. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 3:46 pm
B&B Hardware, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 8:32 am
Regina v B and Others Court of Appeal “Where one of several defendants in the same criminal proceedings became mentally unfit to stand trial before a jury had been empanelled, there was nothing in principle to prevent the jury subsequently hearing the trial of all the defendants, although in the case of the unfit defendant the jury would now be looking only to whether he had committed the actus reus of the relevant offence. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 10:06 am
REDUCED to Probation – Sale of 5 Pounds of Marijuana, State v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 10:34 pm
NOT CHARGED – Child Molestation & Kidnapping, State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 10:16 am
FIRST DEGREE MURDER (2 Counts) REDUCED to Second Degree Murder – State v. [read post]
