Search for: "V. Brim"
Results 61 - 80
of 101
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2018, 9:34 am
v=mwloh #bauch lomb #dryeye #fdaapproval/clearance #imprmispharmaceuticals,” suggesting your compounded cyclosporine product – “Klarity-C drops” -- is FDA approved. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:32 am
Corp. v Zelouf, 45 Misc 3d 1205 [A] [Sup Ct, NY County 2014], a follow-up to her earlier freeze-out merger decision, Justice Kornreich ruled in a post-trial appraisal proceeding decision brimming with helpful insight for practitioners on the standards for fair value appraisals, that it would be unfair under the facts of the case to impose a discount for lack of marketability (DLOM) to a 25% corporate interest, ruling that “no New York case stands for the… [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 4:16 pm
The big guns are now rolling in with their war chests full to the brim, and they’re unlikely to take any prisoners. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 12:06 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 8:50 am
V. [read post]
5 May 2013, 3:41 pm
Baker J on the rare cases that must go outside of 26 weeks here in Devon CC v EB & Ors [2013] EWHC 968 (Fam). [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 11:59 am
From today's North Dakota Supreme Court decision in Wrigley v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 6:13 am
Buono, Black v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:11 am
In 1954, the Supreme Court over-ruled the "separate but equal" doctrine in the Brown v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 10:01 am
Here's the complaint I filed, represented by the folks at the Protect Democracy Project: Wittes v FBI Complaint (PDF)Wittes v FBI Complaint (Text) Who knows? [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:19 pm
First of all, the Court held earlier this year in Ashcroft v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 1:22 pm
Supreme Court decision in Plyler v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 12:45 am
Police cells in London are said to be full to brimming with rioters and Magistrates Courts sitting all night and all weekend to get through the numbers being prosecuted. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:00 am
Jugement déclaratoire déterminant la véritable nature du recours. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:19 pm
As a third reason for the application of the statutory percentage to the total parental income, is that courts, including the Appellate Division, Second Department, have, in fact, routinely applied the statutory formula to combined parental income as high as and greater than $200,000 (see Scheinkman, New York Law of Domestic Relations, § 16.34, at 679; compare Matter of Brim v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:40 pm
" ruling in Thuiskopie v Opus for jiplp. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 2:36 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:30 am
In Knox Couty v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 10:42 pm
Moreover, in Wandsworth, Hackney and Islington Holman J, applying the analysis in R v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:15 am
See post on Kee v. [read post]
