Search for: "V. M. A.D." Results 1 - 20 of 232
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2013, 6:25 pm by lennyesq
  In Melody M. v Robert M., 103 A.D.3d 932 (3rd Dept. 2013), the Third Department affirmed a Family Court order that among other changes to the prior joint custody, issued an order of protection against the mother that prohibited her from, among other things, posting any communications to or about the children on any social network site. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 11:08 am by Stephen Bilkis
34 A.D.3d 802 825 N.Y.S.2d 239 2006 NY Slip Op 8978 In the Matter of SURIYA ELNATANOVA, Respondent, v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 3:16 am
Eligibility for unemployment insurance determined by the law in place at the time of the filing of a claim for benefitsDwyer v Commissioner of Labor, 273 A.D.2d 675In June 1997 the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board ruled that former Orange County Personnel Director Joseph M. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 11:33 pm
A disciplinary hearing determination cannot be annulled by the court if the record supports the determinationMarden v Town of Bedford, 249 A.D.2d 547The Town of Bedford Supervisor asked the Town’s Chief of Police, David M. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:10 am by Stephen Bilkis
39 A.D.3d 868 835 N.Y.S.2d 320 2007 NY Slip Op 03705 In the Matter of JOQUAN JOMAINE-ANTHONY V., an Infant. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 3:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Contrary to ACS's contention, the deprivation of the right to counsel is a [29 A.D.3d 1016] fundamental error warranting reversal (see Matter of Otto v Otto, 26 AD3d 498 [2006]; Matter of Miranda v Vasquez, 14 AD3d 566 [2005]; Matter of Knight v Griffith, 13 AD3d 449 [2004]; Matter of Vladimir M., 206 AD2d 482, 483 [1994]; Matter of Williams v Williams, 91 AD2d 1044, 1045 [1983]). [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:08 am
Unemployment Insurance claim rejected following resignation found not medically necessaryMatter of Cartarius-Macri v Commissioner of Labor, 39 A.D.3d 994Laura M. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 2:50 am
After all, the court said, Obafemi had been given a “full and fair opportunity” to litigate the issue of his misconduct at the arbitration hearing.In another unemployment insurance case, Joyce v Commissioner of Labor, 250 A.D.2d 901, the Appellate Division said that the Unemployment Insurance Board had substantial evidence that Stephen M. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 3:56 am
Full evidentiary hearing required before discontinuing GML Section 207-a benefitsGiorgio v Bucci, Appellate Division, 246 A.D.2d 711, Motion to appeal denied, 91 N.Y.2d 814Thomas Giorgio, a Binghamton firefighter, began receiving disability benefits pursuant to Section 207-a effective January 13, 1996 based on his claim of a work-related injury on that date. [read post]