Search for: "V. Sanchez"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,281
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2024, 7:16 am
Dissenting, Judge Sanchez observed that the complaint’s central falsity allegation was based entirely on a post-hoc analysis by an outside expert that relied on generic market research and questionable assumptions. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:57 am
Sanchez-Perez v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:03 am
Bowery was not prejudiced by the court’s acceptance of the untimely papers under CPLR 2004, as the court accepted and considered Bowery’s reply (see Sanchez v Steele, 149 AD3d 458, 458 [1st Dept 2017]). [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:55 am
The case, Sanchez Mora v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:12 am
Chicago, 392 F. 3d 909 (7th Cir. 2004) (“materially adverse”); Sanchez v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 8:09 pm
Ivan Contreras-Sanchez was lawful. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 8:42 am
See United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 6:50 am
See Oliver v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 8:49 am
In Szalai v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 12:43 pm
Judge Sanchez authors a dissent that helpfully summarizes both what's at stake as well as his overall position on the matter. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:10 am
The ruling also created a new circuit split as to whether a plaintiff’s expert opinion can alone satisfy the falsity element of a securities fraud action (NVIDIA Corp. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:40 pm
Taamneh and Gonzalez v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 9:58 am
The Court of Appeal affirms, with Justice Sanchez dissenting.There's definite merit to both of these competing positions. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:28 am
Velasquez-Castillo v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
Smith (Marva) v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:33 am
From yesterday's U.S. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 4:10 am
Spain, Sanchez v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 3:53 pm
(My words, not Justice Sanchez's.)So, when I read all that, my reaction -- again -- was: "Yep. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 4:40 am
Raf Sanchez and Yuliya Talmazan report for NBC News. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
Yahoo News – Michael Bender and Anjali Huynh (New York Times) | Published: 11/29/2023 Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]