Search for: "V.C. v. M.J.B." Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Psychological Parents and Tri-Parenting Relationships
6 Mar 2016, 6:40 am by Daniel A. Burton, Esq.
M.J.B., 163 N.J. 200 (2000). [read post]
New Jersey Divorce and Family Lawyer Blog - http://www.newjerseydivorcelawyer-blog.com/
A Tri-Parenting Conundrum and the Evolution of Custody and Parenting Time
8 Feb 2016, 11:55 am by Lauren Vodopia
(See V.C. v. [read post]
NJ Family Legal Blog - http://njfamilylaw.foxrothschild.com/
Appellate Division Clarifies the Standard to be Applied When Considering Applications for Custody and Parenting Time of Third Party “Psychological Parents”
9 Aug 2014, 10:07 pm by Karen T. Willitts, Esq.
The Appellate Division also examined the case of V.C. v. [read post]
New Jersey Divorce and Family Lawyer Blog - http://www.newjerseydivorcelawyer-blog.com/
The Impact of a Parent’s Terminal Illness on a Change of Custody Application in New Jersey
22 Nov 2013, 10:43 am by Padraic F.X. Dugan, Esq.
” See V.C. v. [read post]
New Jersey Divorce and Family Lawyer Blog - http://www.newjerseydivorcelawyer-blog.com/
A relationship between a child and parent should be curtailed by the court only when in the child’s best interests and not as a means to punish a parent or coerce a parent’s compliance with a court order
23 May 2012, 9:52 am by PaulKostro
[V.C. v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
In addition to paternity testing, fatherhood may be demonstrated through a psychological relationship
14 May 2012, 3:44 am by PaulKostro
”); V.C. v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Resolution of parenting time disputes must be dictated exclusively by concern for the child’s best interests and not by the conflicting desires of the parents
17 Mar 2012, 1:48 pm by PaulKostro
V.C. v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
The law favors visitation and protects against the thwarting of effective visitation rights
9 Mar 2012, 2:55 pm by PaulKostro
M.J.B., 163 N.J. 200, 217-18 (citing Stanley v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
The mere attainment of the age of 18 does not deprive the court of making a custody determination
8 Jan 2012, 10:28 am by PaulKostro
” V.C. v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
It is the relationship between the person seeking custody and the child that determines the standard to be used in awarding custody
2 Nov 2011, 10:32 am by PaulKostro
” V.C. v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Psychological parenthood
29 Jun 2011, 11:43 am by PaulKostro
Div. 2011), A-0938-10T3, June 20, 2011: In V.C. v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
A party who seeks modification of a judgment that incorporates a property settlement agreement regarding custody or visitation must meet the burden of showing changed circumstances and that the agreement is no longer in the best interests of the child
24 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by PaulKostro
See also V.C. v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
A judgment involving custody of minor children may be modified at any time upon the ground of changed circumstances
3 Aug 2010, 1:51 pm by PaulKostro
V.C. v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Custody issues are resolved using a best interests analysis
13 May 2010, 12:51 pm by PaulKostro
Div. 2007) (citing V.C. v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
The mere passage of months does not amount to changed circumstances, although, as children grow older, the parameters of parenting time may change
15 Apr 2010, 9:12 am by PaulKostro
V.C. v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Adoptive parents need not continue sibling visitation
30 Mar 2010, 3:50 pm by PaulKostro
Ed. 2d 645, 652 (1944); V.C. v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Adoption terminates the parental rights of the adopted child’s biological parents
16 Feb 2010, 11:05 am by PaulKostro
In V.C. v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
The failure of the movant to establish a prima facie case that circumstances subsequent to a divorce judgment have adversely affected the welfare of the children precludes requiring a plenary hearing
11 Feb 2010, 9:38 am by PaulKostro
V.C. v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Once an otherwise fit parent demonstrates that the PPR is facing deployment for a significant period of time (e.g., one year or more), she has demonstrated a prima facie case and is entitled to a plenary hearing as to disputed material facts regarding th
17 Dec 2009, 9:05 am
" V.C. v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
A grandparent may force visitation over the wishes of a fit parent by demonstrating exceptional circumstances whereby he or she has become a psychological parent to the child and stands in the shoes of a parent
29 Sep 2009, 9:03 am
Id. at 113-16, 116 n.3; see, e.g., V.C. v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues