Search for: "VAUGHN v. HOLLINGSWORTH"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2013, 7:12 am
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:41 am
Kennedy, California, Constitutional Law, David Boies, David Perry, Defense of Marriage Act, DOMA, Edith Windsor, Gay, Gay Gross-Up, Gay Marriage, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:34 am
Windsor (DOMA).Hollingsworth v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 9:30 am
Hollingsworth, No. 09-17241, 12/03/09 order by 9th Circuit panel (Kim M. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 9:00 am
The Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:19 am
Those cases include Hollingsworth v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
No one knows for sure what the Supreme Court is going to do with Hollingsworth v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
As millions of people eagerly await next week’s Supreme Court action in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:01 pm
District Judge Vaughn R. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 9:24 am
" (at 12) The Supreme Court case is Hollingsworth v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:25 pm
District Judge Vaughn R. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 7:50 am
Hollingsworth v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 3:37 pm
The one-sentence order immediately nullified a stay order issued last June by the Circuit Court in the “Proposition 8″ case — Hollingsworth v. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:20 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in late June in the case of Hollingsworth v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:02 am
These proponents include: Dennis Hollingsworth, Gail J. [read post]
3 May 2013, 9:30 am
Schwarzenegger (now Hollingsworth v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:32 pm
” That ruling is being challenged in one of the new cases now pending at the Supreme Court (Hollingsworth v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 3:00 pm
In a decision June 26 in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to lift the stay on trial judge Vaughn Walker’s order blocking enforcement of the ban, effectively killed Proposition 8. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
In Massachusetts, another federal case tests whether a federal statutory provision containing a sexual-preference distinction is constitutional.The complaint in Perry v Schwarzenneger, filed in the Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Vaughn R. [read post]
