Search for: "VICK v. VICK"
Results 61 - 80
of 123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2014, 5:36 am
Vick (for the Gawker defendants)Legal Claims: Copyright InfringementCourt Name: United States District Court for the Central District of California, Western DivisionCourt Type: Federal Tarantino, a multiple Oscar winning and nominated writer and director, is the writer and owner of a screenplay entitled The Hateful Eight. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 1:26 pm
In Van Dyke v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 4:03 am
Oregon on State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 12:57 am
Charles Swift, counsel to Salim Hamdan, the enemy combatant whose legal case, Hamdan v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:57 am
Lawyers: Sacking Falcons QB Vick Would Be Legal, but Costly
Fulton County Daily Report
The Atlanta Falcons could fire quarterback Michael Vick, who owns a house that has been the subject of a probe into illegal dog-fighting, and face few negative legal consequences, according to three labor and employment lawyers. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 4:34 pm
Aug. 29, 2008)(Brister)("[W]e overrule Porter v. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 6:08 pm
Vick, 4 M.J. 235, 236 (1978) (mem.); United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:40 am
Dunn v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:40 am
Dunn v. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 2:00 am
The quoted paragraph cites a number of case authorities, but seems to rely most heavily on Vick v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 11:19 am
In Kondaurov v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:40 am
Vick, 341 N.C. 569 (1995). [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:40 am
Vick, 341 N.C. 569 (1995). [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 7:17 am
Whitman v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:00 am
The unreported decision is Cole v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 9:16 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:16 am
That is why there was such a strongly negative reaction to Michael Vick’s use of dogs for fighting. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 8:00 am
Cantu v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 2:19 pm
The first case to be tried under the new law was United States v. [read post]
