Search for: "Valdez v. US"
Results 1 - 20
of 205
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2009, 1:06 pm
Stanford student Beverly Moore previews Polar Tankers v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 2:10 pm
Wall Street Journal reporter Russell Gold emailed us with the following question: "If the full $507.5 million is upheld by the lower court, where does the Exxon Valdez award rank among largest punitive damage awards upheld by appeals courts? [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:24 pm
Professor Rick Hasen at Election Law Blog has posted an interesting comment on this footnote (fn. 17) in the Exxon Valdez (Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 6:30 am
The Court, in a 7-2 decision reversing the Alaska Supreme Court, held that a tax implemented by the City of Valdez, Alaska on "[b]oats and vessels of at least 95 feet in length" that regularly use the City's port violated the Tonnage Clause. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 3:27 pm
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] Wednesday heard oral arguments [transcript, PDF] in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:30 pm
This morning the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in the long-running Exxon-Valdez case, Exxon Shipping Company v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:10 am
The Court ruled [opinion, PDF] 7-2 in Polar Tankers v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 3:08 pm
”]; Flores v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 2:20 pm
US v. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 6:00 am
The style of the opinion is, Valdez v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 3:29 pm
Related Cases: Andrews v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 11:13 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 10:06 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] handed down four decisions Wednesday, including Exxon v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 3:59 pm
In Polar Tankers v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
City of Valdez, Alaska (08-310), on the city’s tax on large vessels from out-of-state that use its harbor. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 7:40 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Wednesday heard oral arguments [day call, PDF; briefs] in Polar Tankers v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 3:25 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 4:37 am
"That is the premise behind the fight in Valdez v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 2:49 pm
MMM Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 4:01 am
Judgment in the case of Equitas v R&Q Reinsurance (Brandywine) is expected to be handed down later this month. [read post]
