Search for: "Valor Communication, Inc." Results 21 - 33 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2009, 11:22 am
Obama ran a progressive campaign that echoed many core LatCritical values, including internationalism and global-mindedness, the valorization of human rights and multidimensional diversity, the centrality of antidiscrimination work, a commitment to rigorous interrogation of longstanding dominant assumptions and norms, and a preference for discourse and dialogue over militarism. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
[I'm working on a draft article called When Are Lies Constitutionally Protected? [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
WIPIP/HoustonMy apologies—I was a bit sick so I missed some of the discussion.Mary LaFrance, Distinctly Personal: Trademarks in Individual NamesFight over registration of Cab Calloway’s name by competing groups of descendants. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 3:28 am by Jim Walker
The CAM was entirely complimentary regarding Carnival’s employee which it indicated were supportive, cooperative and opem with their communications. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 9:23 pm
Spendthrift Farm, Inc., 514 U.S. 211, 218–25 (1995) (separation of powers); Washington v. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 7:27 am
It is one given particularly pointed discursive form in the shadow of the intensifying disagreements between the Cuban state and its artistic and intellectual communities since the reinforcement of Leninist discipline on their work, and spiced by the divisions among the U.S. intellectual left (the U.S. right is divided but its discourse does not drive policy in the US at the moment),  The same is true of the countermeasures--discursive and physical--of the Cuban state apparatus. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:24 am by Eric Goldman
Instead, the court valorizes: (1) Judge Katzmann’s DISSENT in the Second Circuit’s Force v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm by Barry Barnett
 The year of Paradox’s debut, 1978, arrived “during a peak era of antitrust enforcement”.[6] But by 2004, Professor Bork’s panegyric to maximizing “consumer welfare” had led the United States Supreme Court to pronounce “charging monopoly prices” not only not a crime but an “important element of the free-market system”.[7]Indeed, Bork’s valorization of a narrowly economic measure of consumer… [read post]