Search for: "Van Antwerp v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2011, 1:26 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 1:18 am
Van Antwerp, Civil Action No. 07-1756 (RCL), Memorandum Opinion (D.D.C., June 11, 2008) PERMITTING HISTORY. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 10:59 pm
PSA Antwerp NV (case C 202/11). [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 12:00 am
In the summer of 2023 Tine Van Hof defended her PhD on this topic at the University of Antwerp. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 6:09 am
Report written by Tine Van Hof, researcher at the University of Antwerp On the 13th and 14th of February 2020, the Academy of European Law (ERA) organized a conference on ‘Recent ECtHR Case Law in Family Matters’. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 1:35 pm
[i] V. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
(citation omitted).2 Öcalan v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 9:25 am
Van Antwerp, 10-5284). [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 6:06 pm
Van Antwerp, Civil Action No. 07-1756(RCL), 2010 WL 2600507 (D.D.C., June 30, 2010)(Royce C. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:05 pm
Van Antwerp, 526 F. 3d 1353, 1361 (11th Cir. 2008). [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
., 1943-Boulder, CO : Westview Press, c2011.AfricaKQC90 .M88 2010The golden book : philosophy of law for Africa creating the National State of Africa under God : the key is the number seven. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:57 am
. : Columbia University Press, c2010.Constitutional LawKF228.G528 J64 2010Gibbons v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
(Spicy IP) Defining ‘literary works’ for copyright protection (International Law Office) Drafting and interpretation of patent claims (IP Frontline) Israel Israel Patent Office accepts lacks jurisdiction and rules anyway: Karl Storz GmbH & Co v Bausch and Lomb (The IP Factor) Economist report ranks Israel 10th in terms of innovation (The IP Factor) Mauritius Mauritius launches IP sensitivity drive (Afro-IP) Netherlands Presiding… [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 5:48 am
192/18, Commission v Poland; C? [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 5:48 am
SpainGoogle v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 11:14 pm
Particularly, the Court of Justice refers to Ferrari v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 3:40 am
The facts in Case C-446/09 In 2002, the Belgian customs authorities inspected a cargo – which lacked a stated destination and was warehoused in the port of Antwerp (Belgium) – of electric shavers from Shanghai (China) resembling designs of shavers developed by Philips. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 10:36 am
While the Mississippi Supreme Court might disagree with DeShaney v. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 11:26 am
First, under the plurality test enunciated in O’Connor v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 12:37 pm
As an example, she referred to the English case of Marinos v. [read post]
