Search for: "Van Den Brink v. Van Den Brink"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2018, 4:35 pm
The authors of this article are both attorneys-at-law at Kennedy Van der Laan in Amsterdam, and have acted on behalf of the Dutch media in the court case against the EU discussed in this article. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 5:43 am
An Inquiry into the Intricacies of Sovereignty and the Separation of PowersKofi Kumado, Changing Perceptions of Sovereignty and Human Rights in AfricaMarjolein van den Brink, Gendered Sovereignty? [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 6:02 am
How Daily Mail Editorial Standards are still Falling Through the Floor – Tom Rowland Case Law, Strasbourg: Von Hannover v Germany (No.2) – Unclear clarification and unappreciated margins – Kirsten Sjøvoll “The cases of Vanessa Perroncel and John Terry – a curious legal affair” – Dominic Crossley Dutch Google Spain ruling: More Freedom of Speech, Less Right To Be Forgotten For Criminals – Joran Spauwen and Jens van den… [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:00 am
After all, as Martijn van den Brink has pointed out: “The true importance of the test is not what it has changed so far, but its potential to effect further change. [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:56 am
A full English translation of the Darfurnica decision of The Hague District Court this Wednesday, which was reported by the IPKat yesterday, has been posted here by Jens van den Brink, a member of the victorious Kennedy Van der Laan team which acted for Ms Plesner. [read post]
29 May 2010, 4:18 am
’ And according to Jens P Van Den Brink, a media law associate at Netherlands firm Kennedy Van de Laan, in Holland the right has been recognised both in civil and criminal law and ‘indirectly laid down in the so-called portrait right clauses of the Dutch Copyright Act. [read post]
17 Apr 2022, 12:12 am
Martijn van den Brink, European Law Open: When can religious employers discriminate? [read post]
20 May 2018, 4:13 pm
Emiel Jurjens and Jens van den Brink comment, via an INFORRM post, on the EI’s growing efforts to tackle fake news and the spread of misinformation following its recent publication of the Communication on Tackling online disinformation Report. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 2:31 am
IPSO 02303-22 A woman v gloucestershirelive, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 09504-22 Hunter v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 10 Clandestine devices and subterfuge (2021), No breach – after investigation 09505-22 Hunter v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 10 Clandestine devices and subterfuge (2021), No breach – after investigation Resolution Statement – 12008-22 A man v mylondon.news, 1… [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
