Search for: "Van Diepen v. Van Diepen" Results 1 - 2 of 2
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2008, 2:58 am
  The decision does not spell out what was ambiguous about the retainer agreement, but both the bench and the appeal court determined that this "engagement" letter was insufficient to spell out an attorney-client relationship.LATIN AMERICA FINANCE GROUP, INC. and WILLIAM VAN DIEPEN, Plaintiffs-Appellants, -v.- CARLOS PAREJA and PAREJA Y ASOCIADOS, Defendants-Appellees. 06-3888-cv UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 2008 U.S. [read post]