Search for: "Van Order v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,561
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2014, 2:06 am
They sought an order that would require Tom to stop its service, amongst others because Tom could not guarantee that the seller would remove his/her own copy. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 10:24 am
U.S. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
Which judge can order a cross-border injunction (Part 2)? [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 6:59 am
" (The other "win" he discussed was Luzerne County Judge Van Jura's opinion in the Kalinowski v. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 2:11 am
Following the landmark ruling by the Supreme Court in Unwired Planet v Huawei, which stated that English courts can decide FRAND terms on a worldwide basis, English courts have become a popular forum for litigating SEP related disputes and it seems that they will likely continue to be so. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 9:53 pm
Peterson v Village of Dowers Grove, 2015 WL 1929737 (ND IL 4/27/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Signs [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 7:58 am
State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 4:09 am
Should the Munich Qualcomm v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
The trial court entered final judgment against Rohrmoos, stating: 1. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 11:19 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 4:15 am
(a Taiwan Corp.) and HTC America (its US subsidiary based in Washington State) are accused of infringement. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
Donald, Moraes and Claisse were also ordered to pay for the publication of the judgment of the Paris Court of Appeal in three professional newspapers or magazines. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 4:42 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 8:39 am
In Spencer v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 8:39 am
In Spencer v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 8:39 am
In Spencer v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 8:32 pm
The Court held that"The threshold issue in evaluating whether a resentence is vindictive is whether the resentence is more severe than that originally imposed" (People v Cahill, 46 AD3d 1455, 1456; see generally People v Young, 94 NY2d 171, 176-177, rearg denied 94 NY2d 876; People v Van Pelt, 76 NY2d 156, 159-160), and a determinate sentence of 25 years is of course more severe than one of 20 years. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:55 am
Co. (4th Dept., decided 2/6/2009) If you had read just the Fourth Department's "ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court" memorandum of February 6, 2009, you might have passed right over this case. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 7:14 am
United States v. [read post]
