Search for: "Van Riper v. State"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2010, 6:33 am
" On the other hand, Tom Van Riper at Forbes argues that such a ruling is unlikely to cause major ripples in sports, especially for the players' unions; Van Riper notes that the Major League Baseball Association has enjoyed an antitrust exemption for years without significant loss to its players. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 5:28 am
The Court stated that neither Van Riper (as asserted by Schuler) nor Layton (as asserted by the State) applied to the instant case because neither involved duplicitous charging. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:32 pm
VAN RIPER, 50 M.J. 89 (C.A.A.F. 1999). [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 8:22 am
Relying on United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 9:07 pm
The will was executed in that State. [read post]
