Search for: "Van v. Van"
Results 21 - 40
of 5,882
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2024, 11:41 am
In Calvary Temple Church of Evansville, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:01 am
A third interim order was made in March 2021 after a contested application by the father to have the child returned to Chilliwack (SZM v KMN, 2021 BCSC 365 (CanLII), (which was decided before Barendregt v Grebliunas, 2022 SCC 22 (CanLII), more on the significance of this case below)). [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 4:51 pm
The Inter-American Court of Human RightsIndigenous People Maya Kaqchikel from Sumpango v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:00 am
In 1962, in Robinson v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 7:16 am
§ 1512) that was at issue in yesterday's oral argument in Fischer v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 12:38 am
The ECtHR Declines to Intervene on Religious Slaughter: on Executief van de Moslims van België and Others v Belgium [2024] ECHR 137, which we noted here. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:19 am
I was delighted to have been invited to participate in the Asser Institute: Center for International and European Law & University of Amsterdam Law School-[Spring Academy] Technologies of sustainability due diligence: Digital tools and global value chain regulations which takes place in The Hague, Netherlands from 8-12 April 2024. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 1:38 am
Quick links: Eva Brems: Strasbourg Observers: In the Strasbourg Club: Executief van de Moslims van België and Others v Belgium: on the recent ECtHR case that held that a ban on ritual slaughter without pre-stunning did not violate Article 9, which we noted here. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 3:22 am
Background In Executief van de Moslims van België and Others v Belgium [2024] ECHR 137, the Flemish and Walloon Regions had both issued decrees prohibited the slaughter of animals without pre-stunning while providing for reversible stunning in cases of ritual slaughter. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 7:01 pm
In Duncan v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 12:46 am
Llega el momento en que el funcionario que asume labores que considera no se ajustan a sus retribuciones o puesto (no por capricho propio sino por mandato jerárquico), y se plantea reclamar, y bueno es conocer las vías disponibles. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:55 am
The ILC’s interpretation of the prosecute or extradite principle aligns with the reasoning of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the 2012 Belgium v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 4:10 am
Recent Texas royalty cases seem to feature litigants on the fixed royalty side trying, more often than not in vain, to escape the clutches of Van Dyke v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 6:03 am
State v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in FDA v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 11:27 am
” Instead, the court looks to see if Twitter properly alleged special damages, such as consequential damages (Hadley v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:02 am
Sahil Kapur and Frank Thorp V report for NBC News. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 5:39 pm
Hartigan v. [read post]
