Search for: "Vanaskie, Judge"
Results 81 - 91
of 91
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2014, 6:28 am
Caldwell, Appeal No. 13-1918, 2014 WL 3674684 (July 24, 2014) (Smith, Vanaskie, Shwartz, J.)The Circuit holds that in a trial for being a felon-in-possession of a firearm, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 1:38 pm
Vanaskie. [read post]
19 May 2011, 9:28 am
Responding to a series of nuanced and articulate defense challenges, the opinion addresses the authority of Congress to vest the Executive with power to define criminal sanctions; the status of “dynamic” software under laws protecting the free flow of ideas to and from embargoed nations; the application of the vagueness doctrine; the law of conspiracy; and the validity of subpoenas under Criminal Procedure Rule 17(c).Judge Scirica, joined by Judges Barry and… [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 10:25 am
The Third Circuit disagreed in an opinion by Judge Smith joined by Judges Vanaskie and Schwartz: Gomez first argues that the DEA’s prolonged warrantless use of a pen register and trap and trace device violated his privacy rights under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 8:13 am
The gang of 14 structured a compromise where a number of judges were confirmed and others were rejected and we got over that hump and then the filibuster has been used again on judges who are really spotless; Hamilton, Vanaskie, and other, so that now it is the vogue and it? [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:49 am
The opinion, written by Judge Vanaskie, is the latest in a string of Doyle violations found by the Third Circuit. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 10:24 pm
In a ruling by Judge Vanaskie, who was also on the panel that reversed weev’s conviction, the Third Circuit affirmed. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 7:06 am
Vanaskie and New Jersey District Judge Joseph A. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
District Judge Robert B. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 6:30 am
There are good, high-level anti-commandeering arguments for why the Third Circuit got this wrong, and why Congress shouldn’t be able to prohibit the states from authorizing practices that the federal government itself is not willing to prohibit (see Judge Vanaskie’s 2013 partial concurrence and dissent). [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 4:21 am
Vanaskie for a unanimous three-judge panel, the Third Circuit affirmed the jury’s compensatory damages verdict and the award of punitive damages against Shealey and Causey, but vacated the award of punitive damages against the five director defendants. [read post]
