Search for: "Vasquez v. Vasquez" Results 141 - 160 of 460
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2011, 5:00 pm by Jean Braucher
The Arizona Supreme Court currently has under review a mortgage documentation case, Vasquez v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 11:46 am
But Gallo/Wynne simultaneously advised certain putative Caves class members to join the proposed settlement, which necessarily seems to require the position, contrary to that of Objector Vasquez, that the settlement is fair, is adequate, is reasonable, and that, therefore, the settlement should be approved. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 2:24 pm
In yesterday's decision of AAA Blueprint v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 11:18 am by Stephen Bilkis
Although the period of the father's incarceration has expired, the appeal from so much of the order as determined that he violated the order of protection is not academic in light of the enduring consequences which may potentially flow from an adjudication that a party has been found to have violated an order of the Family Court (see Matter of Bickwid v Deutsch, 87 [29 A.D.3d 1014] NY2d 862 [1995]; Matter of Cutrone v Cutrone, 225 AD2d 767, 768 [1996]). [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 12:13 pm by Mashel Law, L.L.C.
 Recently, a federal court sitting in the Second Circuit’s Southern District of New York adopted the cat’s paw theory in a sexual harassment case entitled Vasquez v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 12:13 pm by Mashel Law, L.L.C.
 Recently, a federal court sitting in the Second Circuit’s Southern District of New York adopted the cat’s paw theory in a sexual harassment case entitled Vasquez v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 2:23 pm by John M. O'Connor
  On August 29, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Vasquez v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:25 am by David DePaolo
Oklahoma is probably the least likely state one would imagine to be the epicenter of workers' compensation controversy, but since the state did a "reform" which drastically altered some qualification for benefits as well as introducing an opt-out program, the state has been embroiled in dispute.Last week, of course, the state's Workers' Compensation Commission declared opt-out to be unconstitutional, failing the state's guarantee of equal protection.The commission said… [read post]