Search for: "Vaughan v. Vaughan" Results 1 - 20 of 212
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2010, 2:03 am by sally
Vaughan v Vaughan Court of Appeal “A subsequent spouse had to take the other subject to all existing encumbrances, whether known or not. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 2:33 am by sally
Vaughan v Vaughan [2010] EWCA Civ 349; [2010] WLR (D) 95 “When a judge was determining (i) a husband’s application to terminate a financial obligation to his former wife and (ii) the former wife’s application to capitalise the obligation, and he was comparing the financial needs of the former wife and a present wife, there remained a presumption that on marriage each spouse took the other subject to all existing encumbrances, whether known or not. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 2:24 am by sally
Regina (Parent Governors of the Cardinal Vaughan Memorial School) v Archbishop of Westminster and another [2011] EWCA Civ 433; [2011] WLR (D) 142 “The Archbishop of Westminster had an unfettered discretion to appoint who he wished as a foundation governor of a Roman Catholic school in his diocese provided the School Governance (Constitution) (England) Regulations 2007 were complied with, and that included appointing his diocesan director of education as a governor at the… [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 9:21 am by Adam Kolber
In case you haven't already heard, the draft of the DSM-V has been released. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:57 am by nickleydorf
Filed under: Attorney/Lawyer, Criminal Law, Evidence Tagged: forfeiture of constitutional right, Michigan Court of Appeals, People v Vaughn [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
In 2015, Vaughan recruited David Guarnero, a member of her church, to act as a mentor for V through the Big Brothers and Big Sisters of Northeast Ohio (BBBS).According to the suit, despite explicit instructions from the DeFibaughs to refrain from religious activities with V, Guarnero would frequently discuss religion with V. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:11 am by Gabriel Granatstein
In Ma v University of Toronto, an employee’s application was allowed to continue, whereas in Sikorski v Vaughan (City), the employee’s application was dismissed. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 12:45 pm
Vaughan, 718 F.2d 332 (9th Cir. 1983) (search incident of passenger's briefcase unlawful). [read post]