Search for: "Vega v. Secretary of Health and Human Services"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2007, 12:17 pm
First Medical Health Plan v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 12:28 pm
The investigation was led by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General (HHS-OIG), with the collaboration of the United States Secret Service (USSS) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:33 pm
*–As President Obama has not made any appointments to IPAB (knowing they wouldn’t get confirmed), the statute provides that IPAB’s powers will instead be vested not in a group of bureaucrats, but in the hands of a single bureaucrat: our capable Health & Human Services Secretary, Kathleen Sebelius, who recently said, and correctly, that she “doesn’t work for” the American people. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 4:06 am
(Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) District Court W D Washington holds trademark infringement defendant in contempt: T-Mobile v Terry (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Airfx.com – District Court Arizona denies motion to dismiss on reverse domain name hijacking claim: Airfx.com v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 3:22 am
The 2018 maximum deductible Health Savings Account (HSA) contribution for individuals with family coverage under a high deductible health plan (HDHP) is $6,900, rather than the lower $$6850 limitation that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Department of Treasury originally identified as the 2018 maximum deduction amount last March. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-5163 September 13, 2011 Judge: Griffith Areas of Law: Government & Administrative Law, Health Law, Public Benefits In a 2008 administrative appeal, the Secretary of Health and Human Services ruled that a Medicare beneficiary enrolled in Medicare Part C still qualified as a person "entitled to benefits" under Medicare Part A. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:01 pm
However, the risk of enforcement is particularly acute for businesses in the following industries, designed for heightened enforcement and other attention as “Low Wage High Violation Industries” based on their particularly high record of noncompliance: Agriculture, Amusement, Apparel Manufacturing, Auto Repair, Child Care Services, Construction, Food Services, Guard Services, Hair, Nail & Skin Care Services, Health Care,… [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 8:56 am
” Walling v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
The recent self-disclosure cases had potential penalties ranging from $18,900 to $192,400 for environmental violations that the agency determined caused no serious or actual harm to human health or the environment. [read post]
