Search for: "Velasquez v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 45
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2012, 6:16 am by Joel R. Brandes
          In Velasquez v Green, 2012 WL 2885662 (E.D.Tex.)) on February 8, 2012, Petitioner Beatriz Velasquez filed an action seeking the return of her daughter ("JCVG"), to Canada. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am by Aaron Pelley
” http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/839921.opn.pdf State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by Don Cruse
The Court also filled out its March 3 argument calendar by re-setting some previously granted cases: Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 8:57 am by Dwight Sullivan
  One of the less-than-pleasant events during 2010 was the VWAP fiasco in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:39 am by Aaron
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/12/10/08-10436.pdf United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:13 am
The test for severity in international law is an objective one (A v United Kingdom) and we ask whether the humiliation to the victim is so intense that a reasonable person would be outraged (Prosecutor v Aleksovski). [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 10:13 am
Superior Court, 157 P.3d 1017, 1022 (Cal. 2007) (emphasis added), one would reasonably expect that the California definition was categorically broader than the definition at common law, which requires a "substantial step towards committing the crime," United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:43 am
Contrary to Reich's arguments, the fact that it was purportedly not the attorney of record at the time of a hearing before the United States Bankruptcy Court to determine whether the particular asset at issue qualified as an exemption, is not dispositive of the existence of an attorney-client relationship during the period of the alleged negligence. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 5:00 pm
The Court of Appeal grantd the newspaper's writ petition, finding the order an impermissible prior restraint violative of both the United States and California Constitutions. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Moore, No. 06-1082 In a case raising the issue of whether a police officer violates the Fourth Amendment by making an arrest based on probable cause but prohibited by state law, the Supreme Court rules that warrantless arrests for crimes committed in the presence of an arresting officer are reasonable under the Constitution, and that while states are free to regulate such arrests however they desire, state restrictions do not alter the Fourth Amendment's protections. … [read post]