Search for: "Venkatesan v. Place"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2007, 1:00 am
As V. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 8:58 am
In the previous post, V. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 8:22 pm
A recent post by V. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 4:27 am
Their thoughts are available in relation to this recent post by V. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 8:22 pm
I thank V. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 7:26 am
This is a good place to acknowledge the great labours expended by V. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 6:49 pm
Also, Soli Sorabjee has a hard-hitting Op-Ed in the Indian Express commenting on this recent episode by placing it in the context of recent cases involving Article 356, including the Bommai case, which he argued and has also written insightfully about.In the comments section of the post preceding this one, V. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 2:04 am
[Readers might be interested in Mihir Desai's recent article in the EPW in this regard.]For a contrary perspective, see Venkataramana's article (hat tip to Venkatesan). [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 4:32 pm
Venkatesan has interesting thoughts on the CJI's press statements. [read post]
15 Sep 2005, 5:13 pm
V. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 5:44 am
That indeed appears to be the case - the SC judgment in the first Laine case (Manzoor Sayeed Khan v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 4:41 am
Venkatesan in his recent post suggests that Parliament in response to the recent set back should define "OBC" to mean "OBC as approved by the Supreme Court in Indra Sawhney"This represents a gross misunderstanding of the Supreme Court judgment. [read post]
30 May 2016, 1:52 am
One took place last week before Warby J over four days, Theedom v Nourish Training. [read post]
