Search for: "Venture Properties, Inc. v. Parker"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2012, 11:25 am
The style of the case is, Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 8:46 am
Mesa Petroleum Co., 493 A.2d 946 (Del. 1985); Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am
The '669 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Intellectual Ventures v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am
The '669 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Intellectual Ventures v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm
See Parker v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 1:11 am
Parker v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 am
The answer, at least on the outset, is not an obvious one, but was faced by the United Kingdom Court of Appeals over a decade ago.The case in question is 1-800 Flowers Inc v Phonenames Ltd, decided in the very first year of the second millennium, which dealt with the phone number "800-FLOWERS", registered in the US as a trademark in the mid 1980s by the company 800-Flowers Inc. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 3:44 am
Mississippi Court Finds Shareholder Agreement’s Buy-Out Provision May be Invalid “As Applied” Due to Oppressive Conduct In Chain v Ormonde Plantation, Inc., No. 2017-CA-01733-COA [Ct. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
Here is IP Thinktank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
Tile, Inc. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 4:00 pm
Supreme Court decision, Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:20 pm
City of Covina (City Ventures, Inc., et al., Real Parties in Interest) (2018) ___Cal.App.5th ______. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 10:03 pm
(See Grimshaw v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 has reached an agreement with Drug & Laboratory Disposal Inc., Plainwell, Mich., for alleged violations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act requirements for hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal facilities. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
It lays out the reasons for more than $3 million in fines announced on Monday by OSHA against BP joint-venture refinery in Ohio. [read post]
