Search for: "Verizon N.Y., Inc. v State of New York"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2017, 9:19 am
Verizon Communications, Inc., No. 653084/13, 2017 WL 442871 (N.Y. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:44 am
Verizon N.Y., Inc., No. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 4:18 am
In Wiski v Verizon N.Y., Inc., the accident concerned a falling object accident (see recent post discussing falling object case). [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 4:18 am
In Wiski v Verizon N.Y., Inc., the accident concerned a falling object accident (see recent post discussing falling object case). [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 9:42 am
Verizon Communications, Inc. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 2:01 pm
The City had issued a permit to Verizon New York Inc. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 1:48 pm
The City had issued a permit to Verizon New York Inc. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 12:37 pm
Cellular Sales of New York, issued on September 7. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:55 am
Accordingly, Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Complaint was granted as to Plaintiffs’ Sixth Cause of Action, and the action was stayed pending determination of the Article 78 proceeding in New York state court East End Eruv Association, Inc v Town of Southampton, 2014 WL 4826226 (EDNY 9/24/2014) The Order can be accessed at: https://www.docketalarm.com/cases/New_York_Eastern_District_Court/2–13-cv-04810/East_End_Eruv_Association_Inc. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:55 am
Accordingly, Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Complaint was granted as to Plaintiffs’ Sixth Cause of Action, and the action was stayed pending determination of the Article 78 proceeding in New York state court East End Eruv Association, Inc v Town of Southampton, 2014 WL 4826226 (EDNY 9/24/2014) The Order can be accessed at: https://www.docketalarm.com/cases/New_York_Eastern_District_Court/2–13-cv-04810/East_End_Eruv_Association_Inc. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 7:46 am
If you have a case in New York City, other than Title VII, there are two employment discrimination laws to chose from: The State and City Human Rights laws. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am
Moreover, where a trial court sets a specific deadline for expert disclosure, it has the discretion, pursuant to CPLR 3126, to impose appropriate sanctions if a party fails to comply with the deadline (see MacDonald v Leif, 89 AD3d 995; Pirro Group, LLC v One Point St., Inc., 71 AD3d 654; Bomzer v Parke-Davis, 41 AD3d 522; Maiorino v City of New York, 39 AD3d 601) . [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:51 am
Verizon Commc’ns, Inc. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:59 am
Although the complaint alleges that Devine and Neiman induced Allen to lend money beginning in 2000, the continuing wrong doctrine (see Selkirk v State of New York, 249 AD2d 818, 819; Barash v Estate of Sperlin, 271 AD2d 558) applies such that the six-year statute of limitations “began to run from the commission of the last wrongful act” (Community Network Serv., Inc. v Verizon NY, Inc., 39 AD3d 300,… [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 7:47 am
Verizon N.Y., Inc., the plaintiff initiated a collective action against the defendant under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and the New York Labor Law (NYLL) for alleged nonpayment for tasks performed prior to or after his shift as a technician escort – someone who “provid[es] security to technicians during their visits to customers’ homes and businesses. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 7:47 am
Verizon N.Y., Inc., the plaintiff initiated a collective action against the defendant under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and the New York Labor Law (NYLL) for alleged nonpayment for tasks performed prior to or after his shift as a technician escort – someone who “provid[es] security to technicians during their visits to customers’ homes and businesses. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 7:47 am
Verizon N.Y., Inc., the plaintiff initiated a collective action against the defendant under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and the New York Labor Law (NYLL) for alleged nonpayment for tasks performed prior to or after his shift as a technician escort – someone who “provid[es] security to technicians during their visits to customers’ homes and businesses. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 1:24 am
Forrester also rejected efforts by New York's lawyers to transfer the case to New York or dismiss it for lack of jurisdiction. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:53 am
Funding, Inc. [read post]
