Search for: "Verizon Telephone Companies v. FCC"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2009, 3:54 pm
Verizon California, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 8:49 am
Verizon and AT&T will tame content-streaming companies’ disruptive influence. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 12:19 pm
The FCC made these rulings at the request of the cable and telephone companies. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 11:11 am
When a contract dispute arose between two telecommunications companies over the rates charged during the switching process of telephone call transmission, district court committed error in granting partial summary judgment to plaintiff, as it was likely that the same facts and issues would appear before the appellate court in the future after the FCC resolved certain regulatory issues. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:09 pm
This is because the 2018 Order allowed legacy companies like Comcast and Verizon to keep their special federal rights to infrastructure to deploy their services as cable television companies and telephone companies, but fiber broadband companies were out of luck. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 12:00 am
Verizon v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 1:38 pm
Telecom Association v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 11:39 am
First, the NPRM would declare that the “mixed-use” doctrine applies to cable systems not owned by telephone companies (e.g., Comcast or Charter) as well as cable systems owned by telephone companies (e.g., AT&T and Verizon). [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 4:29 pm
Circuit heard the case of Mozilla v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 6:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:28 am
” City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
The court refers to its prior affirmance of the FCC’s common carrier reclassification decision, United States Telecommunications Ass’n. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
The court refers to its prior affirmance of the FCC’s common carrier reclassification decision, United States Telecommunications Ass’n. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:49 am
For example, in Verizon v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 6:13 pm
As he writes, “the Verizon/Google proposal did make one other suggestion: it should be passed by Congress, not the FCC…. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 6:39 am
Insight cited to Verizon Communications v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 12:04 pm
In his view, the ambiguity over whether Congress intended ISPs to be regulated as common carriers (like telephone companies) or information services (like AOL or Prodigy were at the time of the 1996 law at issue) means that the FCC cannot treat them as common carriers, because it is too major a regulatory step. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 7:54 am
Verizon Wireless refused to honor a short-code text message from NARAL Pro-Choice to its own members, as Verizon has a policy against transmitting "controversial or unsavory" speech. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:25 pm
As cable and telephone companies invest billions in the next generation of technology—including fiber optics and next-generation cellular services–application providers fear they will be asked to shoulder more of the costs of that investment through premium service fees. [read post]
