Search for: "Verkowitz v Ursprung"
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2012, 9:44 pm
VERKOWITZ v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 2:51 am
In Verkowitz v Ursprung ;2012 NY Slip Op 30284(U); February 2, 2012; Sup Ct, Nassau County; Docket Number: 665/11; Judge: Anthony L. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 4:20 am
In Verkowitz v Ursprung 2017 NY Slip Op 06675 Decided on September 27, 2017 Appellate Division, Second Department the attorney represented the client in a divorce, and then later in litigation over her husband’s estate, where the divorce proceedings were material. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 2:54 am
Supreme Court answers yes, in Ursprung v Verkowitz; 2011 NY Slip Op 31723(U); June 14, 2011 Supreme Court, Nassau County; and determines that there must be actual continuous representation, and not a general sense that the attorney is still representing client, albeit not in any actual litigation. [read post]
