Search for: "Vernor v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 64
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia)… [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 8:57 am
These sound like business decisions: promotional value v. backlash. [read post]
30 May 2017, 9:31 pm
In Vernor v. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 2:39 pm
They are Snell v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:48 pm
Another topic Nimmer addressed at length was the doctrine of first sale, and he was highly critical of the Ninth Circuit decision in Vernor v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 2:27 am
Prior to the ReDigi decision, in 2010 the 9th Circuit issued its judgment in Vernor v Autodesk (a case concerning promo CDs), in which it ruled that, pursuant to 17 USC §109(d) the first sale doctrine does not apply to a person who possesses a copy of a copyright-protected work without owning it. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:08 am
The First Sale Doctrine in the Digital Age Moderator: Karyn Temple Claggett, Associate Register of Copyrights and Director of Policy & International Affairs, United States Copyright Office Previous Copyright Office study concluded that first sale only covers distribution and thus doesn’t apply in digital context where reproductions are involved. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 8:27 am
The decision was a fairly straightforward application of the test developed by the Ninth Circuit in Vernor v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 11:13 am
This stance confirms, among other things, the validity of the Wall Data test and, therefore, the inapplicability of the first sale doctrine to software licences (Vernor v Autodesk) and, more generally, digital files obtained through online marketplaces like Amazon or iTunes [but see IPKat here]. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 4:10 pm
., Vernor v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:55 pm
” There are relevant precedents by US courts, such as Vernor v Autodesk and MDY v Blizzard, in which it was held that the grant of a licence is not tantamount to a transfer of ownership. [read post]
12 May 2012, 10:19 pm
Víctor M. [read post]
9 May 2012, 9:44 am
In which we discuss the Library of Alexandria, the United States as a pirate nation, and Vernor v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 9:45 am
In which we discuss the Library of Alexandria, the United States as a pirate nation, and Vernor v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:59 am
However, if it were a license, then the first sale doctrine would not apply based on the precedent of Vernor v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:53 am
United States. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:29 pm
In Vernor v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:27 pm
The court also cited to its (relatively) recent opinion in Vernor v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 8:06 am
* The Supreme Court also denied certiorari in Vernor v. [read post]
