Search for: "Very v. Levy" Results 321 - 340 of 853
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2011, 7:40 am by Robert Chesney
The Eleventh Circuit in yesterday’s decision – United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:36 am by Francis Davey
Any competent advisor should have checked whether s.166 was complied with at the very start. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 7:46 am by Darien Shanske
Tax systems treat taxpayers differently all the time, and the central question before the Court in Alabama Department of Revenue v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 8:43 am
”He referred to NCAA v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 4:41 am
  (v)  Are there any subsisting appeals against the listing? [read post]
5 Feb 2022, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
Please shut the f*ck up about yourself and concentrate on the very real public health crisis engulfing Sandwell! [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 2:01 am
 * Jaguar Land Rover DEFEND[ER]s its trade markRosie Burbidge discusses the trade mark conflict between Jaguar and Bombardier -- yes the one about the “very well-known, if not indeed iconic” DEFENDER vehicle. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Livestock Marketing Ass'n (2005), which upheld an agricultural advertising funding system that was economically very similar to a different funding system that the Court had struck down on First Amendment grounds in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:45 am
 Last week the IPKat reported on the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-462/09 Thuiskopie v Opus. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:04 pm by Howard Knopf
The latest is the landmark ruling by Justice Aylen of the Federal Court in Province of Alberta et al v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:53 am by Dan Carvajal
Laws by their very nature divide people into different categories and subject them to differing treatment, but not all laws violate the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:13 pm
Ct. 1520 (2008), and the challenge to Indiana's voter ID law in Crawford v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 4:54 am
 Will this Directive address only management issues such as transparency, or will it touch on sensitive substantive issues such as private copying and the collection of levies for it? [read post]