Search for: "Vest v. Gay" Results 41 - 56 of 56
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2010, 4:30 am by charonqc
On the other side of the coin, I agree fully with those who found Chris Grayling’s remarks that B&B owners should be able to refuse entry to gays offensive. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
In short, no persuasive arguments have been mounted against the disclosure requirement.The non-disclosure advocates strangely echo the Little Sisters of the Poor (in the Zubik v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:59 am by Scott Bomboy
” Recent Historical Stories on Constitution Daily Looking back at a key Supreme Court decision about gay rights The real-life namesake of Martin Sheen’s ‘West Wing’ president Plessy’s place in the list of worst Supreme Court decisions Looking back at the Brown v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 5:55 am by Eugene Volokh
” Over at Forbes.com, IJ Communications Associate Nick Sibilla explains why the High Court’s decision in Nelson v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Court found that Regulation 3 does not carry the force of law (see Weiss v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 8:54 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  In this instance, in fact, nothing might ever come of the move even if the law is never repealed or later watered down, simply because the Board of Governors might -- despite the "authority" vested in it by the new law -- not do what the governor asks it to do. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Rodger Citron
” Chief Justice Roberts then moved on to Justice Kagan.Cards Close to the Vest: Questioning by Justices Gorsuch and KavanaughMuch has been made of the fact that President Trump’s appointees, Justice Gorsuch and Justice Kavanaugh, did not agree in Bostock v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 5:33 am by Tessa Shepperson
My HMO series with David looks at the Management Regulations, and the case of Spencer v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by Adam Thierer
By Adam Thierer & Berin Szoka As we mentioned yesterday, in a new series of essays, we will be examining proposals being put forward today that would have the government play a greater role in sustaining struggling media enterprises, “saving journalism,” or promoting more “public interest” content. [read post]