Search for: "Vigil v. People" Results 181 - 200 of 533
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2014, 1:40 pm
Since the established practice was followed, there was no question of any illegality or unconstitutionality.The decision in AK Subbaiah v Karnataka Legislature Secretariat may also be noted. [read post]
22 May 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Article 15 of the ECommerce Directive lays down the basic principle that EU Member States cannot impose a general obligation on internet intermediaries to monitor what people say online. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:07 pm by Rev. Dr. Cari Jackson
ShareThis article is part of a symposium on the court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 6:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Div. 2002) (affirming denial of summary judgment in a § 201-d(2) case apparently brought based on plaintiff's "involvement in a vigil for Matthew Shepard, the gay college student who was brutally murdered in Laramie, Wyoming," Jennifer Gonnerman, Avon Firing, Village Voice, Mar. 2, 1999). [4].Kolb v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The founders of the United States understood that “an ignorant people cannot remain a free people and that democracy cannot survive too much ignorance. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
People who receive presents might feel obliged to reciprocate, and even if they act with the best of intentions, their vigilance might occasionally flag. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:34 pm by Graham Smith
Article 15 of the ECommerce Directive lays down the basic principle that EU Member States cannot impose a general obligation on internet intermediaries to monitor what people say online. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:34 pm by Graham Smith
Article 15 of the ECommerce Directive lays down the basic principle that EU Member States cannot impose a general obligation on internet intermediaries to monitor what people say online. [read post]