Search for: "Viles v. State of California"
Results 1 - 20
of 45
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm
Since publishing it, I've put out another Lawfare post exploring in more depth the idea that the states' laws might somehow make platforms carry important speech without also making them carry what the Fifth Circuit called "vile" speech. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Kelly v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
In Dobbs v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 3:26 pm
See Dworkin v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
However, it is a modified comparative negligence state so they must show that they are 50 percent or less at fault. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 5:01 am
From People v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 1:12 pm
The court distinguished United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 10:56 am
Lenawee County, Michigan, had an apocalyptic Christian nationalist militia problem about a decade ago. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 1:58 pm
From La Liberte v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 2:14 pm
To turn to speech hostile to a group I belong to (Jews), when I talked about a rare recent group libel case, the Montana State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
Both place their faith in the state, and in the community, to be sure. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am
Gibson v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:04 am
California, 412 U.S. 15, 18 (1973)). [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 6:59 pm
The administration has already filed a notice of appeal asking the Ninth Circuit to review the January 9 ruling in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 12:03 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 6:23 am
Grimshaw v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 8:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 7:05 am
Denying the employer’s motion for summary judgment on the employee’s racial harassment claims under Title VII and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, the court first noted that “the noose is one of the most vile symbols in American history, and it recalls atrocious acts of violence” against African-Americans. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:52 am
California, 403 U.S. 15, 21 (1971), and the government might be inclined to “regulate” offensive speech as “a convenient guise for banning the expression of unpopular views. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
The case was Reynolds v. [read post]
