Search for: "Village Associates v. Perez"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
Cubillos v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
In applying the OML, the courts construe its provisions liberally in accordance with its stated purposes (see Perez, 5 NY3d at 528; Gordon v Village of Monticello, 87 NY2d 124, 127 [1995]; Encore Coll. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
It is to be noted that, as defined by General Construction Law § 66, a "public corporation" includes a "public benefit corporation" such as ECMCC.In applying the OML, the courts construe its provisions liberally in accordance with its stated purposes (see Perez, 5 NY3d at 528; Matter of Gordon v Village of Monticello, 87 NY2d 124, 127 [1995]; Matter of Encore Coll. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
National Association for Surface Finishing v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:13 pm
CLEVENS, Appellant, v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 2:35 pm
Perez Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville 08a0766n.06 USA v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 2:35 pm
Perez Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville 08a0766n.06 USA v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 9:00 am
Canada US targets Canada over copyright in Special 301 Report (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (At Last... the 1709 Copyright Blog) (Michael Geist) Federal Court awards $250,000 to Microsoft over sale of two computers with unauthorised copies of Microsoft software: Microsoft v PC Village et al (Excess Copyright) CIRA: Complaint dismissed, costs awarded against… [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(Native Village of Kivalina v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:59 am
” Japan said it has asked the United States to suspend all non-emergency V-22 Osprey flights over its region after one of the U.S. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
Contrary to his colleagues, Member Walsh would affirm the judge's finding that: (1) CEO Beck unlawfully solicited grievances and impliedly promised to remedy them; (2) Rojas unlawfully interrogated employees Natividad Felix and Henrietta Perez; (3) the Respondent unlawfully refused to allow surgical technician Mullanix-Ackerman to withdraw her resignation; and (4) the Respondent violated the Act by maintaining a policy prohibiting solicitation and distribution by nonemployees on its… [read post]
