Search for: "Village of Kiryas Joel v County of Orange"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2012, 7:46 am
Kiryas Joel is a village in Orange County, in my neck of the woods. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 4:15 am
Orange County Executive Steve Neuhaus reacted saying that if outside inspectors are to be appointed, it should be done county-wide, rather than targeting Kiryas Joel. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:51 am
The undeveloped property at issue in this partial taking condemnation proceeding was located in the Village of Kiryas Joel and consisted of 70.70 acres prior to the taking, and 69.23 acres after the taking. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 10:46 pm
Orange County 8/18/2015)Filed under: Annexation, Current Caselaw - New York [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
Matter of McDevitt v Suffolk County, 183 AD3d 826; Matter of Convers v County of Orange, 139 AD3d 1060; 9. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
Matter of McDevitt v Suffolk County, 183 AD3d 826; Matter of Convers v County of Orange, 139 AD3d 1060; 9. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
" Quoting Matter of Village of Kiryas Joel v County of Orange, 181 AD3d at 685 [internal quotation marks omitted], the Appellate Division explained "[ripeness] is a justiciability doctrine designed to prevent the courts, through avoidance of premature adjudication, from entangling themselves in abstract disagreements over administrative policies, and also to protect the agencies from judicial interference until an administrative… [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
" Quoting Matter of Village of Kiryas Joel v County of Orange, 181 AD3d at 685 [internal quotation marks omitted], the Appellate Division explained "[ripeness] is a justiciability doctrine designed to prevent the courts, through avoidance of premature adjudication, from entangling themselves in abstract disagreements over administrative policies, and also to protect the agencies from judicial interference until an administrative… [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 5:45 am
“To establish aprima facie case for breach of fiduciary duty, a plaintiff must allege (1) the existence of afiduciary relationship, (2) misconduct by the defendant, and (3) damages directly caused by the defendant’s misconduct” (Village of Kiryas Joel v County of Orange, 144 AD3d 895, 898 [2d Dept 2016] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:27 pm
It was taken in the Orange County village of Kiryas Joel. [read post]
