Search for: "Vinson R. Little" Results 21 - 40 of 79
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2014, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
The answer depends a little on what kind of work you are planning. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 8:10 pm by Josh Blackman, guest-blogging
Justice Breyer, noting that Clement had said that the secretary “would do it” and withdraw the funding, asked “I would like a little clarification. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
  I would place this line of argument into the category of “free market” ideology that holds more generally that the government ought to do very little to interfere with “bargained-for” exchanges that buyers and sellers choose to make. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 3:00 am
Prior to that she was the Pricing Analyst for Vinson & Elkins. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
  Yet Judge Vinson’s order is clearly directed at Verizon’s domestic business. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Vinson, the Supreme Court held that sexual harassment in the workplace is a form of intentional sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 6:09 am by Staci Zaretsky
* AG Eric Holder sat down and had a little chat about what’s been going on at the Justice Department. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:30 am
Leatherbury of Vinson and Elkins, acquitted himself much more smoothly, and was initially an effective foil to Scott Brister. [read post]
7 May 2012, 7:40 am by Randy Barnett
 And, if one is already familiar with the “nanny state” metaphor, there is little newsworthy in the post, except for the “Father Knows Best” interpretation of the  trope. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:48 pm by Alison Barnes
Tuesday: The mandate is too much or too little for the Commerce Clause. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am by Lawrence Douglas
The trials often warrant no more than brief mention in textbooks on international criminal law and are seen to have delivered little by way of precedent. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm by Steve Bainbridge
To date, there has been very little, if any, activity by the SEC under the Section 307 rules. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 10:00 am by John Elwood
– has formally adopted the position that Hall Street changes little, and has held that that court will “continue to employ the ‘manifest disregard’ standard. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 3:21 pm by Ronda Muir
  It is a sloppy undertaking with little hard data and many "soft" findings. [read post]