Search for: "Vire v. U. S" Results 21 - 34 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
”  A state legislature’s constitutional inability to favor particular federal legislative candidates and disfavor others explains why the Supreme Court held a dozen years ago in Cook v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:34 am by Peter Mahler
Singh (subsequently named an Associate Justice of the Appellate Division, First Department) in Simon v Kyrejko, 2017 NY Slip Op 31155(U) [Sup Ct NY County May 30, 2017], involving a dispute among the founding shareholders of a pair of affiliated companies that own and operate a Brooklyn-based vodka distillery known as the Industry City Distillery. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:34 am by Peter Mahler
Singh (subsequently named an Associate Justice of the Appellate Division, First Department) in Simon v Kyrejko, 2017 NY Slip Op 31155(U) [Sup Ct NY County May 30, 2017], involving a dispute among the founding shareholders of a pair of affiliated companies that own and operate a Brooklyn-based vodka distillery known as the Industry City Distillery. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 6:34 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
Finalmente, en la demanda se arguye que la ordenanza viola el derecho a la libertad de expresión, puesto que prohíbe desplegar mercancía o pones “rótulos, cartelones, pancartas u otros similares en la vía o área pública municipal”. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 12:30 pm by dnt.atheniense@gmail.com
No Canadá, há outro modelo, em que o provedor apenas notifica o autor, sem extrair o conteúdo, mas, a partir desse momento, também evita que o site de hospedagem vireu em caso judicial. [read post]
28 May 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
Le but avoué et l’effet incontestable du régime sont de permettre au conseil des ministres de contrôler les modifications à la loi uniforme, d’imposer de telles modifications à toutes les provinces participantes et d’empêcher toute modification législative qui n’aurait pas reçu son aval. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Le requérant prétend que les articles attaqués sont nuls et ultra vires des pouvoirs du gouvernement québécois au motif qu’ils violent les lois constitutionnelles ainsi que la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés. [read post]