Search for: "Virgin v. Virgin" Results 1 - 20 of 1,043
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2012, 2:14 pm by Howard Knopf
The guy is a brilliant marketer......Even a good quip about "extra-virgin olive oil" When it comes to cease and desist letters, "be careful what you wish for. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 1:02 pm
"In this case", began Lord Sumption in Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Zodiac Seats UK Ltd [2013] UKSC 46 (3 July 2013).   [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 10:00 pm
Partner Martin Henshall and associate Hanna Hedayati wrote an article for World Trademark Review about the UK Commercial Court judgment in Virgin Enterprises Limited v Brightline Holdings LLC . [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 10:00 pm
Partner Martin Henshall and associate Hanna Hedayati wrote an article for World Trademark Review about the UK Commercial Court judgment in Virgin Enterprises Limited v Brightline Holdings LLC . [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 10:00 pm
Partner Martin Henshall and associate Hanna Hedayati wrote an article for World Trademark Review about the UK Commercial Court judgment in Virgin Enterprises Limited v Brightline Holdings LLC . [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 10:00 pm
Partner Martin Henshall and associate Hanna Hedayati wrote an article for World Trademark Review about the UK Commercial Court judgment in Virgin Enterprises Limited v Brightline Holdings LLC . [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 10:00 pm
Partner Martin Henshall and associate Hanna Hedayati wrote an article for World Trademark Review about the UK Commercial Court judgment in Virgin Enterprises Limited v Brightline Holdings LLC . [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 10:00 pm
Partner Martin Henshall and associate Hanna Hedayati wrote an article for World Trademark Review about the UK Commercial Court judgment in Virgin Enterprises Limited v Brightline Holdings LLC . [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:48 am by sally
Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Delta Air Lines Inc [2011] EWCA Civ 162; [2011] WLR (D) 60 “Notwithstanding the difficulties which could arise in cases where the technology was complex, it should not be assumed that summary judgment was not for patent disputes; the general rules as to summary judgment applied equally to patent cases as to other types of case and where the technology was relatively simple to understand, and the court was able, on summary application, to form a… [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:31 am
*******Citizen Coverage**********(NOTE:This space is reserved for citizen coverage of the Virgin v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:36 am
Director of Public Prosecutions of the British Virgin Islands v Penn [2008] UKPC 29; [2008] WLR (D) 149 “Where a defendant had been convicted by a jury which had been empanelled from an array which did not meet the requirements laid down by statute his conviction should not be overturned and a retrial ordered unless the statutory language and intent so required or there was reason to think his trial had been unfair. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 10:06 am
" IPKat points out that the broad claims of the patents do seem to match what a Virgin Media set top box does and that Virgin Media's dismissal of the action as 'flagrant opportunism' and 'without merit' may be a little premature. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 9:33 am
" IPKat points out that the broad claims of the patents do seem to match what a Virgin Media set top box does and that Virgin Media's dismissal of the action as 'flagrant opportunism' and 'without merit' may be a little premature. [read post]