Search for: "Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. State Corp. Commission" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Some have argued that, because the Nation’s approach to climate change is politically contested,[1] and since these matters affect major policy questions over which Congress has not granted the SEC new, explicit powers, the Commission lacks authority to require disclosure in this area.[2] For the reasons given below, the Commission should disregard these claims, focusing instead on the challenging policy choices that any finalization of the proposal would require. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Illinois Department of Revenue (1967) and Quill Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
EPA, that EPA, when deciding whether it was appropriate and necessary to regulate Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) such as, for instance, mercury and other toxic pollutants emitted from electric utility power plants, must consider the costs of compliance at this stage of the rulemaking proceedings. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
MacDonald 12-1490Issue: Whether the Virginia courts unreasonably applied Lawrence v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
– Enviro.BLR.com, May 5, 2010 A steam and electricity provider for a multinational chemicals manufacturing plant in Narrows, Virginia, recently settled alleged Clean Air Act violations with the federal government and Virginia. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
– Charlotte Observer, March 8, 2010 Norfolk Southern Railway Co. has agreed to pay a $4 million penalty for a 2005 chlorine and diesel fuel spill that killed nine people and polluted a creek in western South Carolina, the federal government said Monday. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
Environmental Protection Agency and the Commonwealth of Virginia. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
“It is critical that the state not offer carbon credits for business-as-usual management by timber companies or, worse, encourage clearcutting and other destructive logging practices while doing nothing to address the immediate impacts of climate change. [read post]