Search for: "Voltage Pay LLC" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2018, 1:36 pm by Howard Knopf
Voltage had been ordered to pay $75,000 into court for security for costs forthwith– which dates back to February 2, 2017 – more than 19 months ago. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:38 pm by Howard Knopf
" She cited a letter sent to defendants that asks $7,500, saying that amount would increase up to $150,000 without prompt payment.The case is Voltage Pictures LLC v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:38 pm by Howard Knopf
" She cited a letter sent to defendants that asks $7,500, saying that amount would increase up to $150,000 without prompt payment.The case is Voltage Pictures LLC v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 2:33 pm by Timothy B. Lee
Enlarge (credit: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images) A Texas jury has ordered Intel to pay $2.18 billion in damages for infringing two patents. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 12:52 am
The plaintiffs, Voltage, LLC, Cobbler Nevada, LLC, PTG Nevada, LLC, Clear Skies Nevada, LLC, Glacier Entertainment S.A.R.L. of Luxembourg, Glacier Films 1, LLC, and Father & Daughters Nevada, LLC (collectively, “Voltage”), are suing a proposed defendant class of a potentially unlimited number of Canadians for copyright infringement. [read post]
10 May 2017, 3:30 am by Barry Sookman
In an important ruling yesterday in Voltage Pictures, LLC v Joe Doe #1 2017 FCA 97, the Federal Court of Appeal ruled that the notice and notice regime established under the CMA changed the law. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The decision of the Federal Court in Voltage Pictures LLC v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 1:56 pm by Howard Knopf
I have recently written about the Voltage “reverse class action” copyright infringement lawsuit wherein Voltage is trying to sue 50,000 or so people for an effective filing fee of about $0.001 per defendant, and in which Voltage has so far has been unwilling to pay $75,000 for security of costs, despite having been ordered to do so “forthwith” almost 20 months ago on February 2, 2017. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 4:55 am by Ben
The court also required that any subscriber must be able to request a full copy of the Judge's order, which Voltage will have to pay for. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:22 am by Howard Knopf
If Plaintiffs seek to use the powers of this Court to vindicate its rights, it must pay the requisite fees like every other Plaintiff. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 2:26 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Voltage Pictures LLC, an American film company responsible for films such as The Hurt Locker, alleged approximately 2,000 people using Teksavvy had unlawfully downloaded their movies and sought a Norwich order for their subscriber identification to be provided. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
In the Federal Court’s decision of Voltage Pictures LLC v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:00 am
What Australian infringers will ultimately pay remains unclear, but Justice Perram's judgment makes a lot of sense to this Kat, allowing for the recouping of lost monies without unduly burdening the individuals with payments above and beyond their level of infringement and possible ability to pay. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Check the glossary. https://t.co/D8A8CDw0wj -> Order permitting CIPPIC to intervene in the Voltage disclosure motion Voltage Pictures, Llc v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 7:11 am by Michael B. Stack
Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)recently cited Eagle United Truck Wash LLC for 14 safety and health violations at its facility within the Flying J Truck Stop in Jackson, Georgia. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 9:39 am by Paralegal Student
The firm has represented a production company named Voltage Pictures LLC in a case that orders the ISP TeckSavvy Solutions to issue the names and addresses of suspected illegal downloaders. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:11 pm by Eric Schweibenz
According to the Order, Complainants Spansion, Inc. and Spansion LLC (collectively, “Spansion”) moved to compel Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) to produce certain documents, witnesses, information, and samples relating to the manufacture and programming of Samsung’s accused flash… [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Voltage Pictures, LLC, et al., 2018 SCC 38 (37679) ISP’s are entitled to be compensated for reasonable costs incurred to comply with Norwich orders (Voltage Pictures (2015)), but not every cost. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Check the glossary. https://t.co/D8A8CDw0wj -> Order permitting CIPPIC to intervene in the Voltage disclosure motion Voltage Pictures, Llc v. [read post]