Search for: "Voltage Pay LLC" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm by Matthew Ackerman
In the context of many utility takings, for example, property owners are concerned about health risks or hazardous conditions associated with living in close proximity to high-voltage transmission lines. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 2:33 pm by Timothy B. Lee
Enlarge (credit: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images) A Texas jury has ordered Intel to pay $2.18 billion in damages for infringing two patents. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 12:52 am
The plaintiffs, Voltage, LLC, Cobbler Nevada, LLC, PTG Nevada, LLC, Clear Skies Nevada, LLC, Glacier Entertainment S.A.R.L. of Luxembourg, Glacier Films 1, LLC, and Father & Daughters Nevada, LLC (collectively, “Voltage”), are suing a proposed defendant class of a potentially unlimited number of Canadians for copyright infringement. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 10:06 am by Howard Knopf
A user who has not offered to pay such royalties may nonetheless be liable for copyright infringement. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Voltage Pictures, LLC, et al., 2018 SCC 38 (37679) ISP’s are entitled to be compensated for reasonable costs incurred to comply with Norwich orders (Voltage Pictures (2015)), but not every cost. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 1:36 pm by Howard Knopf
Voltage had been ordered to pay $75,000 into court for security for costs forthwith– which dates back to February 2, 2017 – more than 19 months ago. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Voltage Pictures, LLC this week https://t.co/1rUhyfs7Lc 2018-09-10 EU Parliament holds 'last chance' vote on copyright https://t.co/24CCgIX5UT 2018-09-10 GUEST COLUMN: Here’s why U.S. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 4:51 pm by Howard Knopf
Two of my recent posts deal with:       The refusal of the Supreme Court of Canada to grant leave to appeal to Voltage Picturesregarding the Federal Court’s order of February 2, 2017 – as upheld by the Federal court of Appeal – to pay $75,000 into court for security of costs forthwith. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 1:56 pm by Howard Knopf
I have recently written about the Voltage “reverse class action” copyright infringement lawsuit wherein Voltage is trying to sue 50,000 or so people for an effective filing fee of about $0.001 per defendant, and in which Voltage has so far has been unwilling to pay $75,000 for security of costs, despite having been ordered to do so “forthwith” almost 20 months ago on February 2, 2017. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Check the glossary. https://t.co/D8A8CDw0wj -> Order permitting CIPPIC to intervene in the Voltage disclosure motion Voltage Pictures, Llc v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Check the glossary. https://t.co/D8A8CDw0wj -> Order permitting CIPPIC to intervene in the Voltage disclosure motion Voltage Pictures, Llc v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:38 pm by Howard Knopf
" She cited a letter sent to defendants that asks $7,500, saying that amount would increase up to $150,000 without prompt payment.The case is Voltage Pictures LLC v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:38 pm by Howard Knopf
" She cited a letter sent to defendants that asks $7,500, saying that amount would increase up to $150,000 without prompt payment.The case is Voltage Pictures LLC v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 3:30 am by Barry Sookman
In an important ruling yesterday in Voltage Pictures, LLC v Joe Doe #1 2017 FCA 97, the Federal Court of Appeal ruled that the notice and notice regime established under the CMA changed the law. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
In the Federal Court’s decision of Voltage Pictures LLC v. [read post]
  As we store away the wrapping paper and pull out the New Years’ hat and horns, we thought it would be a good time to review the significant agricultural law developments of 2015. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:00 am
What Australian infringers will ultimately pay remains unclear, but Justice Perram's judgment makes a lot of sense to this Kat, allowing for the recouping of lost monies without unduly burdening the individuals with payments above and beyond their level of infringement and possible ability to pay. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am by Barry Sookman
., Sep. 22, 2014) also finding a common law performance right in pre-1972 sound recordings; and Capital Records, LLC v Sirius XM Radio, Inc (Sup.Ct.Cal. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 9:39 am by Paralegal Student
The firm has represented a production company named Voltage Pictures LLC in a case that orders the ISP TeckSavvy Solutions to issue the names and addresses of suspected illegal downloaders. [read post]