Search for: "Von January v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 147
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2009, 10:16 am
Back in January we had two posts about the California Court of Appeal's unpublished opinion in Stevens v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am by Maureen Johnston
At its Conference on January 16, 2015, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as liability for a priest’s failure to report inappropriate sexual conduct, scope of the exhaustion requirement in a takings claim, the Heck v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:49 pm by Nietzer
In determining whether or not the judgment will be enforced, the court will evaluate what “comity,” as defined in Hilton v. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
United States On 22 January 2019 the US Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to take up an appeal in Hassell v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 7:12 am
VONS is the Czech acronym for Výbor na obranu nespravedlivě stíhaných (Committee for the Defence of the Unjustly Persecuted): “The committee was founded on April 27, 1978, by a group of Charter 77 signatories [among whom were Václav Havel and Jan Patočka, the latter having died of a stroke ‘after a long and intense interrogation by the secret police’ before the committee was formed] with the aim of following… [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:31 am by Linda Panszczyk
Case date: 26 January 2024 Case number: No. 22-10866 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Concise European Design Law by Verena von Bomhard and Alexander von Mühlendahl€ 125 Genuine Use of Trademarks, Second Edition … [read post]
Case date: 12 January 2024 Case number: No. 21-55881 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Concise European Design Law by Verena von Bomhard and Alexander von Mühlendahl€ 125 Genuine Use of Trademarks, Second Edition … [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Ashby Donald and others v France (Judgment of 10 January 2013) the Court of Human Rights has, for the first time in a judgment on the merits, clarified that a conviction based on copyright law for illegally reproducing or publicly communicating copyright protected material can be regarded as an interference with the right of freedom of expression and information under Article 10 of the European Convention. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 1:20 pm
The picture is courtesy of Verena von Bomhard. [read post]
  More from our authors: Concise European Design Law by Verena von Bomhard and Alexander von Mühlendahl€ 125 Genuine Use of Trademarks, Second Edition by Eléonore Gaspar€ 190 [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:59 pm by INFORRM
The judgment was eventually published on the cover of the Paris-Match issue of 5 January 2006, accompanied by the editorial note “Albert of Monaco: The truth condemned. [read post]