Search for: "Voth v. Mills"
Results 1 - 3
of 3
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2023, 6:16 pm
In Regie Nationale des Usines Renault SA v Zhang (Renault v Zhang), the High Court (at [78]) described the test as requiring the applicant to show the Australian proceeding: would be productive of injustice, because it would be oppressive in the sense of seriously and unfairly burdensome, prejudicial or damaging, or vexatious … In Voth v Manildra Flour Mills Pty Ltd (Voth), a majority observed (at 566): the extent to which the law of the… [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 11:45 am
(Spiliada Maritime Corpn v Cansulex Ltd (The Spiliada) [1987] AC 460) It has been argued that if the Australian “clearly inappropriate forum” test for forum non conveniens is adopted, (Voth v Manildra Flour Mills Pty Ltd (1991) 65 A.L.J.R. 83 (HC); Regie National des Usines Renault SA v Zhang [2002] HCA 10 (HC)) it is unlikely that a foreign claimant seeking compensation from a parent company in an English court… [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 9:48 pm
International family law can be tricky. [read post]
