Search for: "Vural v Vural" Results 1 - 5 of 5
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Rule 4 Service of Summons and Complaint
28 Mar 2023, 6:46 am by Y. Michael Yin, JD
SCOTT V. [read post]
North Carolina Divorce Lawyers Blog - http://www.northcarolinadivorcelawyersblog.com/
Case Law, Strasbourg: Sinkova v Ukraine, Conviction for performance art war memorial protest did not violate Article 10 – Ronan Ó Fathaigh and Dirk Voorhoof
21 Mar 2018, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
” Finally, the majority examined the “nature and severity of the penalty,” and noted the conclusion in Murat Vural v. [read post]
Inforrm\'s Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
Case Law, Strasbourg: Mătăsaru v Moldova, Activist’s conviction for hooliganism over ‘obscene’ protest violated Article 10 – Ronan Ó Fathaigh and Dirk Voorhoof
26 Jan 2019, 3:44 am by INFORRM
Hungary); pouring paint on statues of Atatürk was an ‘expressive act’ performed as a protest against the political regime (Murat Vural v. [read post]
Inforrm\'s Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
Case Law: Strasbourg, Dickinson v. Turkey, Yes, Prime Minister (bis): prosecution for satirical collage violated Article 10 – Ronan Ó Fathaigh and Dirk Voorhoof
29 Mar 2021, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
In an earlier case (Tuşalp v. [read post]
Inforrm\'s Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
Case Law, Strasbourg: Mariya Alekhina v. Russia, Pussy Riot, the right to protest and to criticise the President, and the Patriarch – Dirk Voorhoof
17 Sep 2018, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Likewise, pouring paint on statues of Ataturk has been considered as an expressive act performed as a protest against the Turkish political regime at the time (see Murat Vural v. [read post]
Inforrm\'s Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/